MFeld ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Proof Morgan
I agree that the coin looks worse than the AU58 exmple you posted. But that’s largely due to the cleaning. Still, it has too much detail to grade 50, 53 or even 55, whether straight-grade or detail-g… (View Post)2 -
Re: Proof Morgan
Thank you for catching my mistake. The language used by PCGS is “PR Genuine UNC Detail”. (View Post)1 -
Re: Proof Morgan
@coastaljerseyguy said: While I can understand your thinking. I’ve seen “Harshly Cleaned” Proof 60 details examples graded by NGC, PCGS and ANACS. Edited to add: what I posted previously was incorrec… (View Post)1 -
Re: Proof Morgan
Proof 60 details, harshly cleaned. Edited to add: Based on the language used by PCGS, please allow me to change that to “PR Genuine Harshly Cleaned-UNC Detail”. Here’s an example of a “Cleaned” Proof: (View Post)5 -
Re: Crossover to CACGrading - Two out of three ain't bad
I’m glad that you had such a good experience. Those are nice looking coins. Which image background option do you prefer? (View Post)1
