MFeld ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: x
A very large number of people care whether ASE’s grade 69 or 70. The fact that you apparently don’t doesn’t have any bearing on that. (View Post)1 -
Re: CAC News: Published Grading Standards and New Insert Coming
My question wasn’t in bold font when I posted it. I hope you don’t edit anyone else’s posts in a more severe manner, then display them as if they were the original quotes, as you did with mine.🫢 (View Post)2 -
Re: CAC News: Published Grading Standards and New Insert Coming
What’s your point? That CACG was tight? That PCGS was loose? Or that CACG was a bit tight and PCGS was a bit loose? Whatever your answer, your sample size was just a wee bit too small. 😉😉😉 (View Post)1 -
Re: High retail on problem coins
On the subject of 1877 Indian cents, since the beginning of last year, Heritage has auctioned more than 30 detail-grade business strike examples. And since you mentioned “EF” (XF), here are some resu… (View Post)10 -
Re: CAC News: Published Grading Standards and New Insert Coming
I haven’t looked at the published standards. I was saying that @Coinscratch gave an obviously inaccurate description of how they grade. (View Post)1