MFeld ✭✭✭✭✭

What you and the dealer did wasn’t “conservation.” (View Post)

It’s not particularly smart to wager a grade guess of 64 after the OP has stated that the coin received a detail-grade, due to “questionable color”. But that’s what can happen when you don’t read rel… (View Post)

My post was partly tongue-in-cheek, but what’s your disagreement? That you don't see portions of each side which escaped the heavier applications of artificial color or that I haven’t seen many coins… (View Post)

I disagree. At least there are portions of each side which are free of heavy applications of artificial toning. And I’ve seen many coins where there were no such areas. 😉 (View Post)

The graders might not have seen any 1921 Matte Proofs - the one being discussed is a 1922. (View Post)