MFeld ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: GTG: Proof WLH -PR68
Because there’s not typically a grade deduction for missing details due to a worn die. And some of the “contact marks” might be as struck. (View Post)3 -
Re: CACG Market Status Observations
While the statement would apply to ANY accumulation of coins, it was in response to a post which only mentioned CACG coins. There was no promotion of a false narrative involved. (View Post)1 -
Re: Why do we have to use the PCGS price guide for crossovers?
They’re able to charge higher fees thst way> @PerryHall said: Not necessarily. (View Post)2 -
Re: Buying the best quality you can afford …
After having read Bruce’s posts over a period of many years, seeing some of his coins and having an idea regarding his collecting habits and strategies, I wondered if the above question was asked in … (View Post)6 -
Re: Buying the best quality you can afford …
Gentlemen, I don't see anything written in Bruce's posts indiccating that he was the buyer when the coin sold two decades ago. (View Post)7