MFeld ✭✭✭✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Genuine question
The “.92” after the PCGS coin number (133809) on the grading label indicates cleaning. There was a time - I don’t know precisely, when - when PCGS omitted the wording of the detail-grade issue from t… (View Post)3 -
Re: Stacks Bowers to Offer Newly Discovered 1804 Dollar- WOW!!
You’re comparing a single 1804 dollar’s price performance to that of gold when it’s very close to historic highs, after a huge run-up. That doesn’t begin to prove that gold’s a better investment than… (View Post)1 -
Re: What one feasible change/improvement would you like to see the major grading companies make?
Again, the Star is for exceptional eye appeal, not about the coin being PQ. And the two terms shouldn’t be used together because that confuses the issue. However, on the subject of “PQ” coins, if you… (View Post)1 -
Re: Would David Hall Rare Coins mind?
Why not notify David Hall Rare Coins and ask/tell them about it? (View Post)3 -
Re: Made my first AU58+ Capped Bust and its a POP 1
However nice the coin might look in the images, why do take it as a given that NGC undergraded the coin, rather than that (gasp😮) PCGS overgraded it? (View Post)15
