-
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
PSA grading process: “A series of PSA graders review your cards for authenticity. If genuine, PSA looks for evidence of doctoring, such as re-coloring or trimming.” So is “evidence” static (point in … (View Post)1 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
What is most troubling to me about Brent’s/PWCC’s position is that their proposed conservation versus alteration determination is evidence-based and not knowledge-based. That is, if the detection of … (View Post)2 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
PWCC is the best at doing what they do. They need to recognize that this new stuff with the stickers and their so called “tenets” will only hurt their reputation. I have to admit that I am an addict … (View Post)1 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
These definitions should be the purview of TPG. That PWCC is both defining and also auctioning = greed! IMO. (View Post)3 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
Doesn’t PSA have to opine here and, knowing the history, either agree with it or disagree and possibly re-grade it? (View Post)1
