-
Re: Altered Cards and a Concerned Hobbyist
Joe O said: This is disappointing because I think Joe O is level-setting our expectations and that their investigation will result in very little/nil. I am in Finance. Joe’s statement is just like my… (View Post)2 -
Re: Altered Cards and a Concerned Hobbyist
Thanks AFL for keeping this open, but please understand that it is simply impossible for Joe to separate his collector side from his CEO of PSA side. His editorial is supposedly as a collector and it… (View Post)2 -
Re: Altered Cards and a Concerned Hobbyist
“human-based opinion is simply unattainable...”. OK, but what about the expertise and experience that you also promote to support your service? What about the “Professional” in PSA? What about those … (View Post)4 -
Re: Jeff is representing PWCC
The legal representation is obviously the primary purpose/objective, but by having a collector in this role (I understand Jeff is a diehard collector known by other collectors), Brent is also trying … (View Post)1 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
PSA grading process: “A series of PSA graders review your cards for authenticity. If genuine, PSA looks for evidence of doctoring, such as re-coloring or trimming.” So is “evidence” static (point in … (View Post)1