FlyingAl ✭✭✭✭✭

Very well done! I also agree that the toning was suspect. (View Post)

Sure thing on the die records. Seems like we have some minor disagreements on the details here, which is ok with me. I think you have a good idea of what is going on and have made your own conclusion… (View Post)

The reason I dismiss your press theory is because we see coins with similar qualities to the 1964 coins in the Smithsonian dated 1958. Therefore, the presses would have had to be in use in 1958, whic… (View Post)

Love this trio! (View Post)

They aren’t necessarily regular in the sense that they are the highest grade examples for 1964, but there is no proof to suggest they are made in any different way than any other 1964 coins. (View Post)