-
Re: Half Cent Attribution - My Offer to Help
@burfle23 :smile: Ha ha! Thought I was going nuts. Coin seemed to have an unknown ‘94 reverse and a non-‘94 obverse. They best part of the scam was the artificial aging of the coin. That was excellen… (View Post)2 -
Re: Half Cent Attribution - My Offer to Help
@jesbbroken @burfle23 I've spent a lot of time (Probably too much) straining my eyes on this one. Overall, it looks real enough though corroded, obviously. It does have a reasonable amount of detail … (View Post)1 -
Re: Half Cent Attribution - My Offer to Help
On quick review: Obverse of your coin: giant heavy “1” in date without top serif and flat across the top. No known ‘94 obverse with those characteristics. Reverse of your coin: stemless. No known ‘94… (View Post)3 -
Re: Half Cent Attribution - My Offer to Help
@jesbroken said, “ I just couldn’t get past it.” when referring to the corroded ‘02 half cent upthread. What you can tolerate when dealing with old time copper rarities is an important factor in buil… (View Post)1 -
Re: Half Cent Attribution - My Offer to Help
The 1811 is a counterfeit for sure. One way to check these coins is to look at the relationship of leaves and berries on the reverse to the letters of “United States of America” surrounding the wreat… (View Post)1