-
Re: OK Heather - why was the 1922 No D weak reverse deleted from the Lincoln sets ????
@Insider2 - Skip Fazzari? Can you focus on the subject matter of the post, or are you having attention problems? Do your company partners know how you talk to potential customers and collectors? Does… (View Post)5 -
Re: OK Heather - why was the 1922 No D weak reverse deleted from the Lincoln sets ????
@HeatherBoyd You should take a look at the 1858/7 Strong vs. Weak. These two PCGS varieties are the same dies. (View Post)1 -
Re: Gettyburg ... not bad for a pop 127/19 coin
Hey thanks for the pics and glad to know it's ownership history. Seems to have a great following by board members back to the 90's! I agree with everyone. Even though I wasn't looking to pick up a Ge… (View Post)1 -
Re: Gettyburg ... not bad for a pop 127/19 coin
67 (View Post)1 -
Re: Gettyburg ... not bad for a pop 127/19 coin
Mitchell, I bought it at FUN this year. Paid strong for it too. The 67 does have a few little ticks in the fields. If you look at the largest TruView, you can see them, but they do not detract from t… (View Post)5