BustHalfBrian ✭✭✭✭

FWIW, I was thinking 62 shot 63. I went with 63 because the strike is excellent for an O mint, and thought it deserved a grade bump for that. But, I think the reason for 61 by PCGS is subdued luster … (View Post)

I've never heard of this die variety, and if it were a mint error, I think ANACS would have labeled it as such. I think one of two things happened: the "detached leg" is a minor variety tha… (View Post)

It's O-105. There is no die break between ED on the reverse, so this wouldn't qualify as 105a. And I think it should go F12, assuming no hidden problems. (View Post)

Sweet toning. I bet that thing looks great in hand. I know from experience how difficult it can be to capture a coin's toning in photos; they never seem to do it justice. Thanks for sharing. (View Post)

Great example. I actually like these in BN more than RD. Thanks for sharing. (View Post)