-
Re: Calling all SLQ Experts
Dan is right, it's a 26-s. Note the serif on the 1. That wouldn't be present on a 20-s. However, I think it maybe was intentional alteration followed by some damage to hide the work. (View Post)2 -
Re: What Percentage of Collectors and Dealers Can Grade?
Very good question. Something does not need to be immutable to be able to measured against, however. Let's say "getting the same grade as a pcgs holder". Yes a coin may receive slightl… (View Post)3 -
Re: eBay question,,,,,
Agree with all the above. Item MUST be delivered or onus is on the seller, not the buyer. eBay requires it, and it's just good business anyways. (View Post)1 -
Re: Are your 1880-S & 1881-S Eagles too large?
No, the planchet is a fixed size before entering the press. (View Post)1 -
Re: Bad news about AT
Agree with you 100% on this. A talented chemist could, with some effort, duplicate a lot of the highly desirable "natural" toning patterns out there. Trying to determine at vs nt can be ver… (View Post)1
