-
Re: Looks like the recent hobby fraud is now a story in the Washington Post
IMO a mixture of what actually happened in 2016 and a lot of loose speculation, unsupported hyperbole and some utter nonsense about the current allegations. No one should be so naive to think that th… (View Post)4 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
Brent’s position, if the experts can’t detect it then why should we care, is indefensible. Going back to the beginning the hobby has been based on a paradigm that cards should basically be UNALTERED … (View Post)6 -
Re: Does this look legit? Or no
It looks right, but I wouldn’t get too excited about its value. Rose has signed so many thinks in the last few decades that it’s now a commonplace autograph. He’s been doing an almost weekly signing … (View Post)1 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
I am not advocating putting heads in the sand or waiting for things to blow over, nor am I trying to minimize the scandal. However, I find it completely irresponsible that more than a handful of post… (View Post)3 -
Re: Alteration vs. Conservation? (Now defined by PWCC)
Well said. The fact that some altered cards apparently made it into slabs is upsetting and needs to be addressed. What is more upsetting is that there are a number of people out there who are on a &q… (View Post)4