-
Re: FS; FBL; RB; Red; FB; etc., etc., etc.
That is fair. But the numerical grades have much more granularity; it's not "good or not good," but almost 30 grades. If the TPGs wanted to put more granularity into these designations… (View Post)1 -
Re: FS; FBL; RB; Red; FB; etc., etc., etc.
Thanks for this; it's useful! My issue is not with the idea that "full bands" can be valuable to a collector, as a part of "good strike"; it's with the binary nature of … (View Post)1 -
Re: FS; FBL; RB; Red; FB; etc., etc., etc.
Well, except that's not entirely correct. All else being equal--for the exact same coin--having FBL, FSB, FS, FH or whatever on the holder makes the coin more valuable than not having it on the … (View Post)2 -
Re: FS; FBL; RB; Red; FB; etc., etc., etc.
I agree that the system, such as it is, is inexact. I agree that one should "buy the coin, not the holder." Which is why I don't like binary "designations" for non-binary con… (View Post)3 -
Re: Throw out the Price Guides - I believe that they are WRONG!
I understand that this is the internet, invented in part so that people could argue. But I really don't see why this simple concept--For very scarce coins, that don't come to auction very o… (View Post)4
