Kudos To PCGS - Revised 1964 "SMS" Descriptions

Options
FlyingAl
FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭

I saw a revised 1964 "SMS" description on the half dollar page today, and I think it provides a fair balance between the old narrative and the current research we have now.

Thank you to PCGS for correcting their statements!

A copy-paste of the new description is below.

"Charles Morgan:
The 1964 Kennedy Half Dollar Specimen Strike
A group of five coins appeared together in a May 1990 Stack's auction as an individual lot. The lot was not illustrated; only because the coins were atypical for 1964 issues did the assortment warrant inclusion in a Stack's sale. On the basis of the catalog description and subsequent lot viewings, the set sold for $715.

AN UNUSUAL 1964'P' SET

  1. 1964'P' Cent through Half Dollar. Choice Brilliant Uncirculated. Nearly all show evidence of die refinishing at the Mint. The 1¢ is red gold with planchet striations on the obverse, the reverse fully struck up. The 5¢ has pale pastel iridescence and a mirror rim like a 1941 coin. The 10¢ has light russet toning on a satiny surface with faint striations. The 25¢ has normal lustre. The 50¢ has a fully satiny obverse and a somewhat reflective reverse. The strike on all the coins is far sharper than is seen even on the Special Mint Sets. We suspect that these were struck as an experiment to determine the sort of finish the Mint would use from 1965 to 1967.

Auction catalogers serve as both numismatists and salespeople, and the description for Lot 1352 certainly did a bit of both. The description of the individual coins presents detailed numismatic information that would likely escape memory unless one were a specialist in the series. The comparison to Special Mint Sets, however, shaped market perception and it is what sold this "unusual" set for nearly 100 times the going rate of a standard five-coin set of 1964 business strikes. This exact framing reappeared repeatedly as additional sets surfaced at auction between 1990 and
1997.
Prompted by the phrase "far sharper than is seen even on the Special Mint Sets," the market's understanding of the coins drifted into a compelling narrative: We believe these were prototypes struck before the SMS coins were minted in 1965—trial pieces, if you will. It was an alluring hypothesis that contextualized the distinctiveness of the coins, which do indeed possess a fabric and surface finish unlike standard circulation-quality pieces.

The Adams and Merkin Connection
What explains this?

It appears that inside information was circulating through the professional numismatic community at the time. According to a account that Harvey Stack shared with John W. Dannreuther and others, and corroborated in 2024 by dealer Steve Blum via Mark Feld, the coins offered through Stack's originated from former Mint Director Eva Adams, who provided them to New York coin dealer Lester Merkin. Adams served as Director of the Mint from 1961 to 1969 during a tenure marked by immense change. Faced with the challenges of meeting commercial demand for U.S. coinage and the rising cost of silver, Adams oversaw the historical transition from silver to clad coinage. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, she directed the lightning-fast creation of the half dollar to honor the fallen president. Adams closed out her term by overseeing the opening of the fourth Philadelphia Mint at 5th and Arch Streets in August 1969. Following her government service, she enjoyed a second career as a hobby ambassador, serving on the American Numismatic Association's Board of Governors from 1971 to 1975.

Physical evidence strongly reinforces the connection between Adams, Merkin, and these unusual strikes. The coins linked to Merkin share the same distinct fabric — and in some cases, the same die flaw (a strike-through on the chief, high on the federal shield on the reverse of the Kennedy Half Dollar) — as the specimen example preserved in the Smithsonian's National Numismatic Collection, proving they were struck from the exact same dies in close succession.

When Were the Specimen Strikes Made?
Following President Kennedy's death, the Mint worked with unprecedented swiftness to redesign the half dollar. While legislation authorizing the change moved through Congress, the finishing touches on the design and consultations with Jacqueline Kennedy were well underway. Chief Engraver Gilroy Roberts adapted his 1961 Kennedy Presidential Medal (#532681) portrait for the obverse, while Assistant Engraver Frank Gasparro adapted the Presidential Seal for the reverse.

Early trial strikes were presented to Mrs. Kennedy on December 17, 1963. She requested that Roberts soften the detail in her late husband's hair, leading to revisions on subsequent dies. Proof production began in early January 1964; early proof strikes featuring the original, unedited design are known today as the "Accented Hair" variety (#6801), while the edited design accounts for the vast majority of 1964 Kennedy Half Dollar Proofs (#6800). Mass production for circulation began on January 30, 1964, at the Denver Mint, followed shortly by the Philadelphia Mint. A ceremonial striking ceremony was held at both the Philadelphia and Denver Mints of February 11, even though business strike production was already underway.

As was annual practice since the Mint Cabinet was transferred to the Smithsonian Institution, the Mint provided the National Numismatic Collection with representative examples of each year's coinage and medal issues. Numismatic researcher Alex Schultz analyzed these coins alongside original Mint accession documentation for his November 2024 The Numismatist feature, "The 1964 Special Mint Sets: Special or Not?"

Schultz revealed that the Mint officially transferred 20 coins of "regular coinage," along with two 1964 Proof Sets and two 1964 Assay Commission Medals, on March 30, 1964 — just eleven days after the earliest recorded delivery of regular 1964 half dollars to the Federal Reserve.

This date is critical: it indicates that the Mint's primary objective in early 1964 was releasing the new coin to a waiting public, not conducting experimental work on finishes for the 1965–1967 Special Mint Sets. Furthermore, the Mint categorized these pieces simply as "regular coinage" in transfer documents. While Assistant Mint Director Frederick W. Tate could have formally designated them as special strikings, Mint officials likely saw no need to apply nuanced non-standard nomenclature to 20 carefully handled coins destined for the nation's museum collection.

What the Coins Reveal
Numismatics is often a forensic science. Even when official documentation is sparse, the physical coin communicates its history directly.

Setting aside the long-held theory that these were experimental prototypes for the 1965–1967 Special Mint Sets, several physical truths emerge:

The coins were produced using freshly polished dies and specially handled planchets.
They represent initial strikes off new dies. Details are sharp. Planchets and dies were specially prepared.
Following ejection, the coins were individually handled with exceptional care to prevent contact marks.
Eva Adams had access to the coins and put several sets away.
The matching physical features between the Smithsonian's set and the commercially known "Adams-Merkin" sets prove they share a single, specific origin. Furthermore, as Steve Roach and Jeff Garrett documented in their August 2013 Coin World feature, "Hidden in Plain Sight: Smithsonian Reveals Modern Era Treasures," the Smithsonian holds several other "off-the-books" presentation specimens. I personally reviewed a 1971 Eisenhower Dollar (#7406) exhibiting specimen characteristics during a 2016 visit.

While the theory of "SMS experimental strikes" can be safely put to rest as the Mint already possessed the technical capability to produce high-grade proof finishes, discussion will continue regarding whether these pieces should be classified as true Specimen strikes or simply early business strikes given VIP handling. The physical evidence demonstrates that the Smithsonian examples and the Adams-Merkin coins share an identical, deliberate production origin.

As for the remaining mysteries? Perhaps some details will remain unwritten. And that is okay. After all, no one ever recorded what flavor of ice cream 15-year-old Hallie Daggett bought with her 1894-S Barber Dime (#4805)."

Comments

  • cmerlo1
    cmerlo1 Posts: 8,075 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Congratulations and great detective work!

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Maywood
    Maywood Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The coins were produced using freshly polished dies and specially handled planchets.
    They represent initial strikes off new dies. Details are sharp. Planchets and dies were specially prepared.
    Following ejection, the coins were individually handled with exceptional care to prevent contact marks
    .

    Some additional research would be nice to understand what was done with the dies after the aforementioned strikes, as well as how many were struck. Absent any of that it remains entirely plausible that other coins were struck with the dies and entered circulation.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,889 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 3, 2026 8:41AM
    Options

    @Maywood said:
    The coins were produced using freshly polished dies and specially handled planchets.
    They represent initial strikes off new dies. Details are sharp. Planchets and dies were specially prepared.
    Following ejection, the coins were individually handled with exceptional care to prevent contact marks
    .

    Some additional research would be nice to understand what was done with the dies after the aforementioned strikes, as well as how many were struck. Absent any of that it remains entirely plausible that other coins were struck with the dies and entered circulation.

    This definition only creates even more uncertainty unfortunately. There need to be very specific criteria. For instance, struck from "freshly polished dies" could apply to any PL or any early struck piece. The same for "sharp details." The "handled with exceptional care" is also nebulous at best. Are they saying that high grade/preservation is the decisive factor? If so, wouldn't that make any coin about superb gem or better handled with "exceptional care?" Define "specially prepared" planchet. How was it prepared and how does one identify the "special" preparation?

    As I stated in the original thread, I think many of the "specimen" strikes are nothing more than PL or near PL business strikes and certainly fall within the normal spectrum of what business strike production could produce. Without documentation, we are turning into 21st Century Walter Breens basing everything on hopes, dreams, speculation, and innuendo. That does great harm to the hobby.

  • Maywood
    Maywood Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    For instance, struck from "freshly polished dies" could apply to any PL or any early struck piece.

    No, I don't think it could.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Maywood said:
    The coins were produced using freshly polished dies and specially handled planchets.
    They represent initial strikes off new dies. Details are sharp. Planchets and dies were specially prepared.
    Following ejection, the coins were individually handled with exceptional care to prevent contact marks
    .

    Some additional research would be nice to understand what was done with the dies after the aforementioned strikes, as well as how many were struck. Absent any of that it remains entirely plausible that other coins were struck with the dies and entered circulation.

    We know that they were used to strike standard mint set coins for the year, since we have coins from these dies from mint sets. If I was to take issue with the current PCGS description it would be the specially prepared dies statement.

  • Maywood
    Maywood Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 3, 2026 10:00AM
    Options

    Yeah, as is the Mint’s habit for generations they don’t retire dies, so it’s possible a 1964 SMS coin could be found in circulation. :s:p>:)

    At least a coin struck from the dies.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • FlyingAl
    FlyingAl Posts: 4,470 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Maywood said:
    Yeah, as is the Mint’s habit for generations they don’t retire dies, so it’s possible a 1964 SMS coin could be found in circulation. :s:p>:)

    At least a coin struck from the dies.

    Yep, that was precisely the stimulus for the changes in description.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file