Options
Why are some cards not counted in the weighting of a set?
sleepingbear
Posts: 7 ✭
Recently I have added numerous cards to one of my sets and nearly all of them are indicating that the card is optional and not counted in the set weighting. Some don't make any sense. Like an Xfractor of one card is allowed while the Refractor is not counted. How does PSA determine whether a card will or will not be counted in the weighting? Is it possible that these cards were marked like that in error?
0
Comments
I've had several dealings with Cosetta, Joe and others at PSA, the chips didn't always fall my way, but their explanation was worthy of accepting their rationale.
GL
Recently I have added numerous cards to one of my sets and nearly all of them are indicating that the card is optional and not counted in the set weighting. Some don't make any sense. Like an Xfractor of one card is allowed while the Refractor is not counted. How does PSA determine whether a card will or will not be counted in the weighting? Is it possible that these cards were marked like that in error?
This is because the items were added to the compositions after April 30. They will become required, weighted items, in black instead of red, after June 1. This way, it gives competitors a fair month to acquire items before the annual awards deadline. It happens for any items added during May each year. Any other month and it is straight to black without the waiting period.