Options
What do you make of these two Sesqui TrueViews
shylock
Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
The top Trueview was a 64, the bottom an upgrade to 65. What is strange is the scuffy appearance of Washingtons cheek in the newer image. Maybe just the lighting angle?
Beautiful Sesquicentennial
Beautiful Sesquicentennial
Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Nice toning!
Looks like ole' George is blushing.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
The difference in lighting sure makes a difference!
Well, just Love coins, period.
To me, it looks like mostly lighting artifact, but the coin could have continued to "mature" a bit between photos. When you get it back and can see it in-hand, you'll know immediately.