Jefferson D over horizontal D ghost?
Have any of the other Jefferson variety hunters noticed that sometimes there seems to be a trace of the underlying mint mark. Case in point is the picture below of a 42 D Jefferson nickel. It looks like it might be the right one, but it almost appears that it someone at the mint may have tried to remove the mistake from the die, then minted some more? Am I crazy? Can anyone make the picture larger? The image is larger in the file I have saved, but when I load it to photoshop it reduces it (even after I change the size).
0
Comments
...need a tighter shot.
...i re-read your thread. i too can't manipulate sizing of the pics.
I have seen Jefferson MM in depressions, so that means that the MM area was actually raised on the die...explain that?
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
Hope you are able to get a hold of someone who could catch a better close-up? This would be great to see. Maybe there is a "strong" and "weak" D / Horizontal D? This would be quite interesting.
Dowgie
I once had a 46 D/lazyD that PCGS did not label. ANACS however did recognize it.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
at the Tenn. State show two weeks ago. A well circulated example, it has a strong underlying horiz. d. The horiz. d is up near the upper serif of the primary d. I'll try a get a pic to post in a little bit. Shag.
of the horizontal underlying d in relation to the primary image. Shag
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection