Toggle navigation
Quick Links:
Collectors Corner
|
PCGS
|
PSA
|
PSE
|
Collectors.com
|
CU
|
Coinflation
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
U.S. Coin Forum
Circ Franklins, Numismatic value?
gdavis70
Posts:
256
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 9:51AM
in
U.S. Coin Forum
Is there any numismatic value over silver spot for Franklins like these below? They were collected in the early 50's through the 60's, some looking like they were save in unc.
AntiqueBanknotes
•
National Currency
0
Comments
AUandAG
Posts:
24,992
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 9:57AM
No extra value that I can see. Check the 53s for full bell lines. If you have that
then I'll change my mind.
bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
0
gdavis70
Posts:
256
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:04AM
The 53 plain is pretty on the obverse but the back has toning and the bell lines aren't nearly as nice as the nicest coin (1959)
To the refinery I guess.
AntiqueBanknotes
•
National Currency
0
BigE
Posts:
6,949
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:08AM
They are worth more than melt if they are the low mintage dates in close to unc shape---------BigE
I'm glad I am a Tree
0
gdavis70
Posts:
256
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:10AM
How about Walkers in Whitman albums in the same condition? More than melt?
AntiqueBanknotes
•
National Currency
0
LotsoLuck
Posts:
3,786
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:16AM
Walkers should do better.
0
coinman420
Posts:
4,666
✭
March 18, 2010 10:21AM
<< <i>How about Walkers in Whitman albums in the same condition? More than melt? >>
i would say yes. is it a complete set of walkers?
my ebay items
BST transactions/swaps/giveaways with: Tiny, raycyca,mrpaseo, Dollar2007,Whatafind, Boom, packers88, DBSTrader2, 19Lyds, Mar327, pontiacinf, ElmerFusterpuck.
0
DennisH
Posts:
14,015
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:39AM
There are lots of folks who like Walkers, even if they're just common dates in common grades.
When in doubt, don't.
0
MsMorrisine
Posts:
36,901
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 10:50AM
and franklins.
Current maintainer of Stone's
Master List of Favorite Websites
//
My BST transactions
0
gdavis70
Posts:
256
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 11:38AM
The walker set is missing three coins 1916S on Obv, 1921 and 1921D
however, the 1917S is worn to the point the it's just readable as a 1917S
AntiqueBanknotes
•
National Currency
0
rld14
Posts:
2,390
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 12:12PM
<< <i>The walker set is missing three coins 1916S on Obv, 1921 and 1921D
however, the 1917S is worn to the point the it's just readable as a 1917S >>
PM Sent
Bear's "Growl of Approval" award 10/09 & 3/10 | "YOU SUCK" - PonyExpress8|"F the doctors!" - homerunhall |
I hate my car
0
lcoopie
Posts:
8,874
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 12:50PM
not the 53s plural, the 53S san francisco mint
LCoopie = Les
0
gdavis70
Posts:
256
✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 12:54PM
ahh...the 53s bell lines are worn or weak.
AntiqueBanknotes
•
National Currency
0
lcoopie
Posts:
8,874
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 12:59PM
53S full bell lines, big money.
LCoopie = Les
0
Overdate
Posts:
7,193
✭✭✭✭✭
March 18, 2010 2:52PM
The only Franklin bringing a modest premium (close to double melt) in average circulated condition is the 1955.
0
Leave a Comment
Bold
Italic
Strikethrough
Ordered list
Unordered list
Format
Spoiler
Code
Quote
Heading 2
Heading 1
Emoji
Url
Image
Align left
Align center
Align right
Toggle HTML view
Toggle full page
Toggle lights
Drop image/file
Home
•
U.S. Coin Forum
Comment As ...
Comments
then I'll change my mind.
bob
To the refinery I guess.
<< <i>How about Walkers in Whitman albums in the same condition? More than melt? >>
i would say yes. is it a complete set of walkers?
however, the 1917S is worn to the point the it's just readable as a 1917S
<< <i>The walker set is missing three coins 1916S on Obv, 1921 and 1921D
however, the 1917S is worn to the point the it's just readable as a 1917S >>
PM Sent