Recent submission results in........Grades Posted

coinsarefun · March 3, 2010 1:44PM

Does anyone want to guess the grades?

3 out of 8 graded

1962 25C MS64
1964 1C PR1BN
1964 50C N1
1964-D 50C N1
1963 50C N1
1954 50C MS64
1963 50C PR66
1883-O $1 N1

StubbyMcNumbthumbs · March 3, 2010 1:58PM

MS65
PR68
MS64
MS65
MS65
MS65
PR67
MS66

I'm not gonna try and figure out FBLs.

Nice selection!

JOZ · March 3, 2010 2:16PM

Nice coins.

MS65
PF68
MS63
MS65
MS64
MS66FBL
PF67
MS66

Dkillett · March 3, 2010 2:21PM

I'm not sure about the grades, but that last 63 Franklin is AWESOME. Beautiful Colors.

ChrisRx · March 3, 2010 2:22PM

65
68
64
66
65
65fbl
67
65

typo

Broadstruck · March 3, 2010 2:24PM

This is pretty

stinkinlincoln · March 3, 2010 2:30PM

Ok Ok OK... Im not a big fan of the Washington quarter, mostly due to his own views of him on coins, but that 1962 is one of, if not, the sexiest, eye appealing, monster quarters Ive ever seen for the series. I love it! And the obv is so clean, and has almost a cam look to it. Damn thats a nice coin Stef!

Deagle74 · March 3, 2010 3:56PM

Great coins Stefanie! I especialy love Morgan and a '63 Franklin.
And I'm glad some of your Kennedy's did slab

(are these two from your Kennedy collection that you showed us some day ago?)

Bye, Rok

jmj3esq · March 3, 2010 9:45PM

I like them all but cant grade the toners from those pics.

coinsarefun · March 3, 2010 10:59PM

<< Great coins Stefanie! I especialy love Morgan and a '63 Franklin.
And I'm glad some of your Kennedy's did slab

(are these two from your Kennedy collection that you showed us some day ago?)

Bye, Rok >>

Not necessarily, I did not say all of them graded.
Some have made their way into genuine holders

bushmaster8 · March 4, 2010 12:00AM

64
68 cam rb
64
QT
QT
65FBL
67Cam
66

I think the HairyHeads are AT. But I know PCGS has been putting scads of AT coins in holders lately, so I won't be surprised if one or both grade.

edit: it's possible the 1962 25c could be called ED or even Thick Toning, although I haven't seen that one used in a while.

Rampage · March 4, 2010 12:41AM

I like them, but I would guess the 1964 Lincoln proof did not get graded due to questionable toning.

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 4:50AM

anyone else or should I post the grades?

richardshipp · March 4, 2010 4:55AM

MS66
PR68
MS64
MS65
MS65fbl
MS65fbl
PR68
MS66

MadMarty · March 4, 2010 4:58AM

post the grades

relicsncoins · March 4, 2010 4:59AM

MS64
Genie, Questionable Color.
MS64
MS65
Genie, Questionable Color.
MS65
PF67
Genie, Questionable Color.

djdilliodon · March 4, 2010 5:14AM

Hard to grade from those pics but what i can say is that the lincoln got bagged, The 1963 ms franklin got bagged, and the washington also got bagged but does have a shot at slabbing.

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 5:52AM

Grades posted in first post under images

guitarwes · March 4, 2010 5:58AM

That's unbelievable.

Pretty coins.

19Lyds · March 4, 2010 5:59AM

What's up with this?

1962 25C MS64
1964 1C PR1BN <===========
1964 50C N1
1964-D 50C N1
1963 50C N1
1954 50C MS64
1963 50C PR66
1883-O $1 N1

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 6:04AM

<< What's up with this?

1962 25C MS64
1964 1C PR1BN <===========
1964 50C N1
1964-D 50C N1
1963 50C N1
1954 50C MS64
1963 50C PR66
1883-O $1 N1
>>

Don't know

jmj3esq · March 4, 2010 6:06AM

Pretty good example as to why I have not renewed my platinum subscription.

richardshipp · March 4, 2010 6:13AM

Ouch !!!

Damn... I better hold off sending in any for awhile.

Bochiman · March 4, 2010 6:33AM

Ouch!
I could see 1, maybe 2, being borderline for them grading right now, but as many as they did???

I think Stef got "THE BIG ONE"™ (and not in the best of ways

)

StubbyMcNumbthumbs · March 4, 2010 6:42AM

That's ridiculous.

I would say just ignore the one dissenting opinion, but it's hard to ignore after spending that much money on their opinion and having them basically snub you.

I still say that's a beautiful selection of coins.

drwstr123 · March 4, 2010 7:26AM

<< Pretty good example as to why I have not renewed my platinum subscription. >>

Nor have I, for the same reason.

robkool · March 4, 2010 7:31AM

OUCH !!! Plus the cost for truviews...

messydesk · March 4, 2010 7:47AM

Ouch. I'm surprised the first 1964 50c QTed.

Fairlaneman · March 4, 2010 7:49AM

<< Pretty good example as to why I have not renewed my platinum subscription. >>

Yep, same here.

I would have said the 1st Kennedy would grade every day all day.

Ken

Goldbully · March 4, 2010 7:50AM

Stefanie no go

Goldbully go????

You were robbed Stef.......

BTW, use my 1961 image and show PCGS they graded an extremely similar coin!!
These coins could be clones, if not brothers. Plus, my coin has a big nasty spot on the reverse.

Bochiman · March 4, 2010 7:53AM

<< Stefanie no go

Goldbully go????

You were robbed Stef.......

BTW, use my 1961 image and show PCGS they graded an extremely similar coin!!
These coins could be clones, if not brothers. Plus, my coin has a big nasty spot on the reverse. >>

Something like this.....has anyone ever had the chance to sit down with someone at PCGS to discuss WHY on something like this?
I know they likely wouldn't want to admit an error, on either the 1st coin NOT getting slabbed, or the 2nd one slabbing, but still....?

Would it require someone with a personal connection? A high volume/influential customer? in order to sit down with Don or David and question this?

Would be interesting to know if it passed the graders and the finalizer nuked it or if the graders nuked it all the way through....

SUMORADA · March 4, 2010 7:56AM

that sucks...

it makes you wonder.........and feel cheated at the same time.

DoubleEagle59 · March 4, 2010 8:00AM

Personally...I think there is something drastically wrong with today's TPG's grading practises.

When you pay good money, to the world's leading grading company of US coins, you want the grading of these coins to be done properly the FIRST TIME!!

if you're going to bodybag most every toned coin, then you better bodybag most of the brilliant white coins too, because they also have been tampered with (dipped).

DoubleEagle59 · March 4, 2010 8:09AM

<< 

<< Stefanie no go

Goldbully go????

You were robbed Stef.......

BTW, use my 1961 image and show PCGS they graded an extremely similar coin!!
These coins could be clones, if not brothers. Plus, my coin has a big nasty spot on the reverse. >>

Something like this.....has anyone ever had the chance to sit down with someone at PCGS to discuss WHY on something like this?
I know they likely wouldn't want to admit an error, on either the 1st coin NOT getting slabbed, or the 2nd one slabbing, but still....?

Would it require someone with a personal connection? A high volume/influential customer? in order to sit down with Don or David and question this?

Would be interesting to know if it passed the graders and the finalizer nuked it or if the graders nuked it all the way through.... >>

We should demand consistency.

This is totally inexcusable, especially when one day THREE graders see it one way, then the next day, THREE graders see it in a complete opposite manner....and it's almost exactly the same coin!!

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 8:11AM

I'm just a little baffled as far as my Kennedy not grading.
I mean no harm or doubts placed on anyone, but both are so close is toning
I am confused.

Maybe someone can help me understand

I hope AnkurJ doesn't mind me using his thread regarding his Kennedy

His original thread about his Kennedy

AnkurJ's Kennedy

Mine

LindeDad · March 4, 2010 8:22AM

Ouuuuuuuuuch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Has PCGS got any submitting customers left who own toned coins.

LotsoLuck · March 4, 2010 8:29AM

That stinks!

Connecticoin · March 4, 2010 8:34AM

This is idiotic. The only coin that is QT is the 63 Frankie.

They are bagging envelope and album toned coins left and right, that they were holdering as recently as 18 months ago. What really sucks is you now have to dip a lot of NT coins to get them graded until PCGS stop being so stupidly cautious about toned coins. But they will still holder circulated type coins and early gold that has been scrubbed to death.

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 8:39AM

<< This is idiotic. The only coin that is QT is the 63 Frankie.

They are bagging envelope and album toned coins left and right, that they were holdering as recently as 18 months ago. What really sucks is you now have to dip a lot of NT coins to get them graded until PCGS stop being so stupidly cautious about toned coins. But they will still holder circulated type coins and early gold that has been scrubbed to death.

>>

The 1963 Frankie came from a Year Set......btw the Washie is a type B

Meltdown · March 4, 2010 8:52AM

I was going to renew my submissin tonight for the 8 free submissions.
Now I think I will save my $200+ and give it some more thought.

Sorry Steph. You got seriously robbed by pcgs this time. I hope someone there reads this thread and
asks themselves the same questions asked here.
There is no consistancy there any more at all.

keets · March 4, 2010 9:00AM

We should demand consistency.

perhaps Goldbully should send in his coin and ask for it to be placed in a Genuien holder??

InternetJunky · March 4, 2010 9:00AM

Based on the result and the discussion in this thread all I can say is WOW.

It was just not your day for a submission Stef

Marauderrt10 · March 4, 2010 9:04AM

well, there goes my 50-60 submissions for tomorrow...

gyocomgd · March 4, 2010 9:07AM

Murder, just plain murder. You have my condolences.

pakasmom · March 4, 2010 9:12AM

A picture's worth a thousand words, indeed. ie: Goldbully's graded example next to Stephanie's rejected example.

Goldbully · March 4, 2010 9:17AM

<< We should demand consistency.

perhaps Goldbully should send in his coin and ask for it to be placed in a Genuien holder??

>>

Have you considered standup???

edited to add: "Hey, I won that coin from a MadMarty eBay auction....it's all his fault!"

keets · March 4, 2010 9:20AM

Geez, what took you so long!!???!!

TomB · March 4, 2010 9:20AM

Stephanie's proof Lincoln received a grade. It appears many folks here are a bit confused on this issue.

DoubleEagle59 · March 4, 2010 9:22AM

<< It was just not your day for a submission Stef

>>

Seems like a lot of people are saying this lately.

I would like to remind everyone that Steph did not visit a Casino nor did she purchase a lottery ticket.

She paid for a 'professional' grading opinion of her coins from the world's largest and most respected company.

To even think 'it was not your day' defintely sends the wrong message about one's company. I would not be very happy if it was my company.

coinsarefun · March 4, 2010 9:29AM

<< Stephanie's proof Lincoln received a grade. It appears many folks here are a bit confused on this issue. >>

I'm not sure what you mean by that, can you explain?
cert number is 16880164

TomB · March 4, 2010 9:33AM

Obviously I am confused, I read your bold text as PR61BN when in reality it says PR1BN. This made me think you had received a grade. Apparently, it did not.

Recent submission results in........Grades Posted

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent submission results in........***Grades Posted***

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent submission results in........Grades Posted