PCGS MS69 Morgans
I recall a couple of years ago or so, someone had like 4 or 5 PCGS MS68 and 69 Morgans listed in the same auction for $1 million (imagine the final value fee now). Does anyone know anything about those coins or have pics of them?
0
Comments
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
<< <i>IIRC that was a Michael Casper auction. He has an archive of coins he's sold at http://caspercoin.com/soldcoins.php if that's of any help. I can't get the search feature to work, but scrolling through a few pages there were some MS68s there. >>
Whoa...those are some unreal Morgans!
There is a PCGS MS69 81-s comming up and it's CACed too.
So, its just a shade away from MS70.
There is a NGC MS68 "star" 81-cc , that has quite a few visable flaws, and imho, is not what I'd expect. Does anyone know if it is a recent crossover from say PCGS 67 ?
In general, it amazes me how crappy morgans can be relative to other coins and still get the same MS grade. Is that what you guys see?
<< <i>There is a PCGS MS69 81-s comming up and it's CACed too.
So, its just a shade away from MS70.
There is a NGC MS68 "star" 81-cc , that has quite a few visable flaws, and imho, is not what I'd expect. Does anyone know if it is a recent crossover from say PCGS 67 ?
In general, it amazes me how crappy morgans can be relative to other coins and still get the same MS grade. Is that what you guys see? >>
That's because the Morgans are large coins. The contact marks are relative to size.
<< <i>
<< <i>There is a PCGS MS69 81-s comming up and it's CACed too.
So, its just a shade away from MS70.
There is a NGC MS68 "star" 81-cc , that has quite a few visable flaws, and imho, is not what I'd expect. Does anyone know if it is a recent crossover from say PCGS 67 ?
In general, it amazes me how crappy morgans can be relative to other coins and still get the same MS grade. Is that what you guys see? >>
That's because the Morgans are large coins. The contact marks are relative to size. >>
I agree with this statement and you have to consider the weight as well which makes it easy for them to get marked up......could you imagine a bag of ASE's.....they'd look like hamburger pretty quick
Here is an 81-S in PCGS MS68
<< <i>There is a PCGS MS69 81-s comming up and it's CACed too.
So, its just a shade away from MS70.
There is a NGC MS68 "star" 81-cc , that has quite a few visable flaws, and imho, is not what I'd expect. Does anyone know if it is a recent crossover from say PCGS 67 ?
In general, it amazes me how crappy morgans can be relative to other coins and still get the same MS grade. Is that what you guys see? >>
I agree completely! It seems like the graders expect a few bag marks on Morgans and pretend they aren't there.
JET
I collect all 20th century series except gold including those series that ended there.