If you think Hall and PCGS are wrong, check this thread . . .

Comments

• wondercoin Posts: 17,056 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 15, 2003 6:53AM

  I am glad DH opened up the discussion and I am hopeful he considers limiting the designation to the bottom bands (just like Franklins are designated using only the bottom bell lines). I went into a little more detail in the thread and I noticed the #1 ALL-TIME PCGS Roosie set collector (Reistrycoin) and the #1 ALL-TIME NGC Roosie set collector (onlyRoosies) also supports use of the bottom bands only to determine the designation. Wondercoin
  
  

  Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.

  0
• DMWJR Posts: 6,091 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 15, 2003 6:56AM

  Mitch for what it's worth, I have the #2 46-64 and the #2 65-present mint state sets, I am fully behind "Bands" and not "Torch." I'm going to e-mail Danny and see if he will chime in.

  Doug

  0
• merz2 Posts: 2,474 ✭

  March 15, 2003 6:57AM

  Mitch
  I agree with you about the bands.

  Don
  Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns

  0