Home U.S. Coin Forum

Back to the drawing board!

CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

1 to 2 points off what I was a hoping :) especially the 67's

Line Items Cert # PCGS # Description Grade Country
1 1 36292444 83401 1963 1C, CA PR66CA USA
2 1 36292445 3296 1967 1C SMS, RD SP66RD USA
3 1 36292446 93452 1977-S 1C, DC PR67DC USA
4 1 36292447 4199 1967 5C SMS SP66 USA
5 1 36292448 84201 1969-S 5C, CA PR67CA USA
6 1 36292449 94210 1977-S 5C, DC PR68DC USA
7 1 36292450 86001 1969-S 25C, CA PR68CA USA

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They certainly look like good grades - obviously you were expecting better. Well, ownership does add a point ;) .... In the words of Bobby Ferrin - "Don't worry, be happy...." Cheers, RickO

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,795 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I take it that this concerns regestry board standings ...

    A couple of points.

    1. I think that it's better to buy the coin in the holder you want rather trying to do with the grading route. This advice might be more relevant for the material I collect, which is generally well over 100 years and is usually not available in such lofty grades. For this modern material it’s probably cheaper to “make it yourself,” but it can also be much more frustrating.
    2. I think it’s wise not to let the registry take command of your collecting habits. There are many other enjoyable aspects to this hobby than just chasing grades and registry standings. I learned that a number of years ago. Unless you have “unlimited funds” there is only going to be a bigger horse in the barn for the most popular sets.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd be very happy with those 7's ..... let us see some pictures :)

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,726 ✭✭✭✭✭

    68 is a tough barrier to break through

    Collector, occasional seller

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    I take it that this concerns regestry board standings ...

    A couple of points.

    1. I think that it's better to buy the coin in the holder you want rather trying to do with the grading route. This advice might be more relevant for the material I collect, which is generally well over 100 years and is usually not available in such lofty grades. For this modern material it’s probably cheaper to “make it yourself,” but it can also be much more frustrating.
    2. I think it’s wise not to let the registry take command of your collecting habits. There are many other enjoyable aspects to this hobby than just chasing grades and registry standings. I learned that a number of years ago. Unless you have “unlimited funds” there is only going to be a bigger horse in the barn for the most popular sets.

    Not yet anyway, I just like the idea of finding the treasure for almost nothing and then o'course it has to be confirmed. So I will most likely hoard it once I do. I think if I had enough money to buy the best coins I would probably be fishing instead and buying coins :)

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    They certainly look like good grades - obviously you were expecting better. Well, ownership does add a point ;) .... In the words of Bobby Ferrin - "Don't worry, be happy...." Cheers, RickO

    And they are certainly better than my first run, which was 60's lincolns grading ms64s and ms65s. Apparently the business strikes are harder to find. And yes, I am happy and now hungry for more.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Paradisefound said:
    I'd be very happy with those 7's ..... let us see some pictures :)

    I will as soon as they arrive, thanks.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ChrisH821 said:
    68 is a tough barrier to break through

    So is 78 on the golf course. I'm still working on that too.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Playing the condition rarity game does not appeal to me. I would rather have a less common coin in a lower grade than a common coin in a lofty grade. To each his own though.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    Playing the condition rarity game does not appeal to me. I would rather have a less common coin in a lower grade than a common coin in a lofty grade. To each his own though.

    I wouldn't mind owning a few of those early 1800's coins myself. I'm sure that bug will get me as well. I'm just going through the motions and right now I'm scratching the surface, get it :)

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Did you expect MS-65 but were 'given' MS-67?

    ;)

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    Did you expect MS-65 but were 'given' MS-67?

    ;)

    I guess you could look at it that way, but I was expecting 69dcam on the quarter and cameo on the sms penny. At least now I will have some specimens for comparison.

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Without clear, public standards - and there aren't any for "cameo" - it's not possible for collectors to assess the potential 'grade' of their coins. This simply wastes collector time and money.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would think the people at PCGS probably have a clear understanding of the parameters for Cameo. And until I can think like that fish I will keep swinging.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Assess the grade maybe not, but the potential should be just the potential right.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Paradisefound said:
    I'd be very happy with those 7's ..... let us see some pictures :)

    Coins finally made it in and here are the pics. So, I posted two pics of the 67 sms 1c and I think I learned something about the Cameo designation. With shade it looks like a Cameo but in full light it obviously is not. What do you think?











  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You did good .... few DCAM would make me happy any day of the week :)
    I really like your 1977 S PR67 RD DCAM <3

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yea, I'm actually pretty happy with the results and the collection is under way :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file