Guess the grade....1900 Double Eagle (grade posted-see first post)
What do you think and why??


NGC graded it as a MS64 and CAC agreed. I thought it had a bit too much chatter on the cheek and wanted other opinions. It appears that lots of the forum agreed, but perhaps this is one that needs to be seen in hand. I liked it due to the strike and will hopefully evaluate it in hand soon. Thanks for the opinions!
2
Comments
64 possible 65 obverse but the reverse looks 63. Guess 64.
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
I have a ms-63, it looks about 1/2 grade better, so I will say ms-63+
I'll go with 61. Seems to have quite a bit of chatter
MS63
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
Collector, occasional seller
62/63 from the images.
Might go higher if the scuffs are lighter than the picture makes them appear.
I’m in with 63+
Agree. The cheek is a prime focal area and there are a lot of contact marks there.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I'm in with PerryHall and ChrisH.
It looks like a 63 to me but I could see a 62 if the graders were grouchy. 64 would be a gift on that one.
The strike is very good, the luster is strong and reverse easily makes 64 tho.........
Grade posted!
Yikes - good thing I don't collect gold!
I do have an OGH St Gaudens in 64 that has FAR fewer marks and grazes than this coin, so based on my very limited experience, with coins of substantially different designs, I put this at 62. Maybe they are more forgiving with a portrait style coin like this one.
W what PCGS would grade it.
MS62.... way too much chatter....both sides....Perhaps in hand, without magnification, it looks better. Cheers, RickO
They would probably go 65. Been my experience anyways that PCGS is much more liberal on pre 33 gold grades compared to NGC.
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
I really don't know nor understand why...
Would mine CAC then?


Here is mine...not the same year but looks much better
Congrats and from what I have seen NGC much tighter on gold then PCGS so that is solid. Plus the sticker seals it.
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
In the spirit of consistency @erwindoc...I think PCGS would give 63
Worth a try.
Both double eagles on this thread are SWEET!
My YouTube Channel
I would say yes, very nice looking coin.
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
Nice coin, but the "euro" look turns people off apparently. Nice photos btw.
I would not buy the coin as a 64.
Please explain what the "euro look" means.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Darkening on the high points; I have seen it on a lot of $20 gold pieces, coins were in Europe in bank bags usually.
Thanks. I've seen dirty looking Saints referred to as having Euro dirt. I'm curious why European sourced coins are like this.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire