66
Nice coin, looks 64 in the old holder.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
66 for me.
Looks like an older holder, so I'll guess 65.
65
The coin is housed in a current holder.
There are no prongs, so it can't be current. It just might not be that old.
I'd guess 66 on it as well.
@jtlee321 said: There are no prongs, so it can't be current. It just might not be that old. I'd guess 66 on it as well.
@jtlee321 said: There are no prongs, so it can't be current. It just might not be that old.
I stand corrected, it's an older holder.
Reverse shot too out of focus
@KollectorKing said: @jtlee321 said: There are no prongs, so it can't be current. It just might not be that old. I'd guess 66 on it as well. I stand corrected, it's an older holder.
@KollectorKing said:
I had a recent reholder come back without the prong insert. I thought it was a bit odd. I'll say 65
Collector, occasional seller
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Would have guessed the luster break on the boob and the lack of hand detail would have limited this to a 65. Very clean though.
nice, but obverse strike is too weak for me.
Interesting.... a very nice coin, however, I did not think it was 66..... The reverse, although blurry, seemed very good.... but I thought the obverse would limit it to 65 Max.... Cheers, RickO
The Arm, the sun, the right field, the eagles wing. If they are clean, you will have a 66 or more every time.
Is that a small scratched going down the eagles breast? 66 if not.
Comments
66
Nice coin, looks 64 in the old holder.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
66 for me.
Looks like an older holder, so I'll guess 65.
65
The coin is housed in a current holder.

There are no prongs, so it can't be current. It just might not be that old.
I'd guess 66 on it as well.
65
I stand corrected, it's an older holder.
Reverse shot too out of focus
I had a recent reholder come back without the prong insert. I thought it was a bit odd.
I'll say 65
Collector, occasional seller
65
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
65
65
Would have guessed the luster break on the boob and the lack of hand detail would have limited this to a 65. Very clean though.
nice, but obverse strike is too weak for me.
BHNC #203
Interesting.... a very nice coin, however, I did not think it was 66..... The reverse, although blurry, seemed very good.... but I thought the obverse would limit it to 65 Max.... Cheers, RickO
The Arm, the sun, the right field, the eagles wing. If they are clean, you will have a 66 or more every time.
Is that a small scratched going down the eagles breast? 66 if not.