Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Would this '79-S Morgan make a PO-01 at PCGS?

KyleKyle Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭✭✭


*Update on Page 2*





This 1879-S Morgan Dollar arrived in the mail today, and looks like it has a good shot at making a PO-01. I have included pictures of my 1878-S FR-02 just for comparison.



1879-S

image

1878-S

image

1879-S

image

1878-S

image
Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover

Comments

  • Options
    SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 9,959 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Darn close but I think it may still go FR2.
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no, fair 2

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 23,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Textbook PO1

    peacockcoins

  • Options
    DavideoDavideo Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭✭
    There is definitely some inconsistency with lowball grading, so nothing would surprise me, but I would say probably yes. At least for the obverse my personal gauge is no stars or motto except for a partial "RIBUS", which is what yours has.

    EDIT: I also like no Liberty visible: your FR02 does and your 79-S does not.
  • Options
    CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a 2 to me.
  • Options
    jtlee321jtlee321 Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it's a P01 to me.
  • Options
    goldengolden Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: jtlee321
    I think it's a P01 to me.


    image
  • Options
    oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 11,907 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a "toss-up".
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore...
  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,125 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree, a "toss up". 50% of the time PO01 and 50% of the time FR02.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    foodudefoodude Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭
    PO01
    Greg Allen Coins, LLC Show Schedule: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573044/our-show-schedule-updated-10-2-16 Authorized dealer for NGC, PCGS, CAC, and QA. Member of PNG, RTT (Founding Platinum Member), FUN, MSNS, and NCBA (formerly ICTA); Life Member of ANA and CSNS. NCBA Board member. "GA3" on CCE.
  • Options
    thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,755 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it's a two......a little too much obverse....
  • Options
    The 79s is a second reverse(rev of 78).It unknown how many were minted in second rev.
    Mark Anderson
  • Options
    joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The obverse looks a little fr2 while the reverse is p01
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • Options
    CMCARTCMCART Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭
    image

    A close family member from Uncle Morgan????

    image
    image
    Abraham Lincoln (February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865)
    5$ bills are WOW with the numbers - wanted:
    02121809
    04151865
    Wanted - Flipper notes with the numbers 6-9 or 0-6-9 ON 1$ 2$ 5$ 10$ 20$
    Wanted - 10$ Sereis 2013 - fancy Serial Numbers
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think PO1 "details" as the peripheral stars and lettering on both sides are essentially gone.



    But it's possible they won't give you that score because of all the bright shiny marks from that coin sliding around for years. The shiny obverse and reverse edges are far less pleasing than a uniformly toned worn PO1. In my mind, a PCGS PO1 should have mostly choice, original surfaces....as it's the ultimate in low end - wear. The shiny highlights and hairline wipes are a distraction.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,704 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A little more likely PO1 than not, but there's only one way to find out.
  • Options
    oldlinecoinsoldlinecoins Posts: 183 ✭✭✭
    P01
  • Options
    KyleKyle Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll have to send this to PCGS eventually. Like Davideo mentioned above there seems to be some inconsistency with lowball grading; so it will be interesting to see how this one fares.



    Originally posted by: FadeToBlack

    That just showed up today? Slow Canadian mail.


    Yeah, I guess the post office started their holidays early or something.
    Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover
  • Options
    IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    From what I have seen, I would give you a 50/50 shot at Poor-1. Yes, they are a bit inconsistent, but when dealing with such low grades, inconsistency is to be expected. A barely readable date and mintmark, with few other details remaining, fulfills my qualifications for Poor-1, but I am not a PCGS grader.
  • Options
    IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Coinstudy
    The 79s is a second reverse(rev of 78).It unknown how many were minted in second rev.


    The 1879-S is the upper reverse image, which is the normal Round Breast reverse. The 2nd reverse image is his 1878-S comparison piece.
  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Think loosing that "LIBERTY" in the headband will get it down there. Good luck.
  • Options
    jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    Close enough but possibly no cigar -( PCGS is very tough on PO-1
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 22,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PO1 seems reasonable

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,128 ✭✭✭
    I think it's a P01. The 1878-S in FR02 has much more detail on the obverse.
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist.
  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,704 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: BustHalfBrian

    I think it's a P01. The 1878-S in FR02 has much more detail on the obverse.


    This brings to mind a sadly serious question. Is it a practiced strategy (or superstition) to use a couple FR2 coins as "setup coins" to get your coveted PO1?



  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I say Yes!
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 27,521 ✭✭✭✭✭
    it looks like a po 2 to me.
  • Options
    davewesendavewesen Posts: 5,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks like 75% of year showing, and it seems to me you need less than 50% for P-01 so I think FR-02


    I hope you do send it in and good luck
  • Options
    KyleKyle Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: messydesk

    Originally posted by: BustHalfBrian

    I think it's a P01. The 1878-S in FR02 has much more detail on the obverse.


    This brings to mind a sadly serious question. Is it a practiced strategy (or superstition) to use a couple FR2 coins as "setup coins" to get your coveted PO1?



    I'm sure it's been done. FR-02's can be purchased relatively cheaply compared to the price of a PO-01.
    Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover
  • Options
    WildIdeaWildIdea Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've sent in for a shot PO-1 and was awarded "questionable authenticity" which I thought was pretty weak. Don't think the boys are interested in playing the low ball game. Maybe PCGS would put out some guidelines? Or just keep us guessing.
  • Options
    WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    If Pat sez PO-1, then it is.
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Has a decent chance at 01.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    KyleKyle Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    After a long wait, the grades are finally in!



    PCGS PO-01
    Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover
  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭


    Sweet!
  • Options
    KyleKyle Posts: 1,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: FadeToBlack

    Congrats bro. Know you've been looking for one for your set for a while.


    Thanks! I would have prefered a '78-S but this one will do for now.

    Successful BST Transactions With: tonedase, streg2, airplanenut, coindeuce, vibr0nic, natetrook, Shrub68, golden, Lakesammman, drddm, Ilikecolor, CoinJunkie, wondercoin, lablover
  • Options
    CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Still looks like a 2 to me.
  • Options
    carabonnaircarabonnair Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭✭✭
    "God we rust" FTW!
  • Options
    pocketpiececommemspocketpiececommems Posts: 5,748 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If this Morgan was a circ commem it would have a tough time getting a PO01 grade. Check out my FR02 Albany or Hawaiian.
  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,422 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you don't get the grade you want, you may have to crack it out, resubmit it and try it again (I imagine there is an emoticon for this, but it's late and I'm tired).
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 30,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: FadeToBlack

    That just showed up today? Slow Canadian mail.



    I think it's got a shot. Maybe 25%.




    So if 4 graders see it, one will give it a PO01?image
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think that it is a FR-02. The obverse needs to be a bit weaker so that you can barely read the date, while the "S" mint mark still needs to show on the reverse.

    I guess it's back to the pocket piece for this one. image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file