Options
Is this authentic
AstroJoe
Posts: 304 ✭✭✭
See this : 1832 Half Dime
I'm not the best on this series, I notice the I in Liberty looks odd, and the last S in States looks like squeezed in. Thoughts?
I'm not the best on this series, I notice the I in Liberty looks odd, and the last S in States looks like squeezed in. Thoughts?
Joe
Everything is all right!
Everything is all right!
0
Comments
But it appears to be genuine, although harshly wire-brushed.
Because this die marriage is an R1, and can be readily found, I would avoid this wire brushed, or whizzed, coin. Other nice examples will certainly come along.
Hard to tell - the pictures are funky.
But it appears to be genuine, although harshly wire-brushed.
this whizzing can strongly affect the edges of devices and cap give coins a counterfeit look.
i used to think they were until i started seeing it on all type of coins i knew to be authentic.
the whizzing is so strong it literally pushes metal up to the top edge of devices giving them a high, sharp-looking edge. almost like an outline.
.
<--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -
The fact that it's been whizzed bothers me too. The latest treads with the counterfeit coins that got into genuine third party grading service holders have been that the pieces were whizzed or polished so that they got an "improperly cleaned" label. Whizzing and polishing gives the counterfeiter the opportunity to remove or blur the telltale lumps and lines that sometimes give away the use of copy dies.
Finally, the photography is odd. Some of the pictures are surprisingly sharp, but the lighting is weird. Those who offer counterfeits sometimes play games with their pictures to hide problems.
It could be real, but why take the chance? I'd say "Run Forest, run!"
The coin exhibits the diagnostics of the 1832 LM-5/V8, an R1 die marriage. But as DCarr points out, it has been harshly wire brushed. Both loops of S2 (second S in STATES) are filled, but only the upper loop of S1 appears to be filled, which seems slightly odd. There is no evidence of the retained cud which develops on the reverse, first below A1 to the scroll, and later from T1 (UNITED) to the upper left corner of the scroll, so it is an intermediate die state. It appears to be genuine, but damaged.
Because this die marriage is an R1, and can be readily found, I would avoid this wire brushed, or whizzed, coin. Other nice examples will certainly come along.
Listen to this person / , one of my favorite posters.
When in doubt, wait until the next shows up.
If someone else bought it and he likes it and real, a good win for him.
Everything is all right!