Options
Since When Does PCGS Call 1817 O.103a (LDS) a "Punctuated Date"?
BustHalfBrian
Posts: 4,125 ✭✭✭
In early die-states, you can see the dot, but in late die-states, the dot is gone. I always thought only the EDS examples were considered the "Punctuated Date" variety - apparently not according to this coin.
I know sellers on eBay often market their O.103a's as "Punctuated Dates" to attract attention to their listings, when in reality it's the O.103 (without a) that's the true variety.
I also understand there's another "dot" that develops between 1 and 7 in later die-states, but forget that one - I mean the original dot. The one that gave the variety it's name.
So is this a mistake on PCGS's part, or are they now attributing O.103a's as "Punctuated Dates"? If so, I've got some buying/flipping to do!
I know sellers on eBay often market their O.103a's as "Punctuated Dates" to attract attention to their listings, when in reality it's the O.103 (without a) that's the true variety.
I also understand there's another "dot" that develops between 1 and 7 in later die-states, but forget that one - I mean the original dot. The one that gave the variety it's name.
So is this a mistake on PCGS's part, or are they now attributing O.103a's as "Punctuated Dates"? If so, I've got some buying/flipping to do!
Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist.
0
Comments
Tom
It's a shame if this occurs often. Most people don't know better than to buy it as the variety, which is worth multiples of a typical O.103a of the same grade.
Lance.
I agree, just the early die state is the punctuated date.
BHNC #203
This isn't a mistake. Someone at the grading house is interpreting Overton's text incorrectly and ruining any rough census there may have been for this variety.
Very frustrating.