Here is the other toner I sent in. ***Grade Revealed***

relicsncoins

I sent this in with the 1881 S that recieved the MS65+

I don't have any current photos of it, and this not the best, but it does show the rich toning. Care to guess what PCGS called it?

Vbowling299

Based on pictures, i would have to say also a 65+

oih82w8

Nice, clean cheek. Good lookin' Morgan, MS64+

STONE

Hard to tell from the photo, so I will just say it looks like a gorgeous toner!

AUandAG

<< <i>Nice, clean cheek. Good lookin' Morgan, MS64+ >>

AnkurJ

QT

Connecticoin

66

PTVETTER

From the photo with as clean as the Cheek and fields are my guess
MS65

Bochiman

66

relicsncoins

Here is what ANACS graded this coin in 1986. Even in the black and white photos, you can see the heavy toning on the reverse.

luckybucks

Easy 65. That is a swwwweeeeeeet Morgan !!

relicsncoins

PCGS agreed with ANACS and awarded MS63. I personally thought the coin would go 64, but I'm guessing the heavy toning on the reverse held it back.

Connecticoin

<< <i>PCGS agreed with ANACS and awarded MS63. I personally thought the coin would go 64, but I'm guessing the heavy toning on the reverse held it back. >>



What is holding it back from Gem? Are there hairlines under the toning?

3keepSECRETif2rDEAD

Nice Morgan! This one needs a True View so people looking through CoinFacts can drop their jaw when they see the assigned grade

Erik

relicsncoins

<< <i>

<< <i>PCGS agreed with ANACS and awarded MS63. I personally thought the coin would go 64, but I'm guessing the heavy toning on the reverse held it back. >>



What is holding it back from Gem? Are there hairlines under the toning? >>



The luster is muted do to the toning.

AMRC

What "held it back" was the person who held it and left that finger print.