Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Who likes Barber dimes? Guess the grade of my newp. **Grade 1st post**

Rob41281Rob41281 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭✭✭
Dont have the pic available but its graded PCGS MS65.

Pics dont quite show how nice it really looks but theyre close.
The scratch running north/south on the center of the obverse is on the slab.
image
image

Comments

  • Options
    bidaskbidask Posts: 13,863 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will guess 66image
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • Options
    MrSpudMrSpud Posts: 4,498 ✭✭✭
    I say 66+
  • Options
    DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like Barber Dimes and I'll say 65-66 hard to tell from pic.
  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 7,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm going with 64 and a pretty one at that. I think there is too much chatter on the cheek to get into a 5 holder.
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,526 ✭✭✭
    That's a lovely dime. I'll say MS66.
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • Options
    DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Superb eye appeal and I believe 65 in today's market.

    What a nice coin . .

    Drunner
  • Options
    SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 9,959 ✭✭✭✭✭
    sweet coin
    image
  • Options
    tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    64
  • Options
    mrdqmrdq Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭
    BEAutiful coin, i'm guessing 65

    --------T O M---------

    -------------------------
  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 13,816 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maaan that's a beaut! I like Barber dimes, I'll take a guess at 65, looks to be quite a bit of luster with this one.....
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    TPRCTPRC Posts: 3,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    66

    Tom

  • Options
    MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭
    MS 65 IMHO - the coin could get a 65 Star at NGC...
    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll guess 64.
    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • Options
    robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS64...
  • Options


    << <i>I'm going with 64 and a pretty one at that. I think there is too much chatter on the cheek to get into a 5 holder. >>



    image pcgs gives to much of a bump for eye appeal to raw coins sometimes, if the cheek on this coin got better then a high end 4 then that proves it.

    Les
    The President claims he didn't lie about taxes for those earning less then $250,000 a year with public mandated health insurance yet his own justice department has said they will use the right of the government to tax when the states appeals go to court.
  • Options
    mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭
    Its in a rattler holder or a ngc black slab with a grade of AU-58 and has a gold CAC sticker. Did I win? imageimageimage j/k Beautiful coin!
    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
  • Options
    MisterBungleMisterBungle Posts: 2,308 ✭✭✭

    I would nod my head in agreement at MS64.

    ~


    "America suffers today from too much pluribus and not enough unum.".....Arthur Schlesinger Jr.

  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,200 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's a beautiful coin but no way is it a 66.

    I'd say most likely 64 or 65 and I'm leaning towards 65.

    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 23,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AU58
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    I'm not an expert on these, but that's gotta be a 65. I like it!
  • Options
    ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 7,900 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>AU58 >>

    image I'm in the 64 camp
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    that's a very nice dime. I would not be surprised at 64, 65, or even 66. would be surprised below 64 and very surpised and congratulate your buy even more if in a 58 holder.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    I'll say a strong 66 and it appears to be just dripping with luster. Beautiful coin!
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • Options
    jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 9,312 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If that is in a 58 holder, I would say, "NFL!" Also known as Not For Long.
    Beautiful coin and belongs in a 64 holder.
    Jim

    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 7,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Based on the toning, is that coin in an old ANACS slab?
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,303 ✭✭✭✭✭
    solid 64, maybe even PQ.

    A tad too many tics as several have stated. It has the eye appeal and blast of a gem coin.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    PawPaulPawPaul Posts: 5,845
    66
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,147 ✭✭✭✭✭
    64, shot 65
  • Options
    63
    dont send sheep to kill a wolf...
  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>I'm going with 64 and a pretty one at that. I think there is too much chatter on the cheek to get into a 5 holder. >>



    image pcgs gives to much of a bump for eye appeal to raw coins sometimes, if the cheek on this coin got better then a high end 4 then that proves it.

    Les >>



    65 ? Did anyone see MFH's 65* barber half that got crossed into a 64 plus pcgs holder ? Maybe their is a mark or marks that can't be seen from MFH's pics of that coin (and I'm going to ask MFH to comment on that here) but if their isn't any then how does the cheeck on this dime warrant a 5 while MFH's half only gets a 4 plus ? MFH, did you do a crackout submission of that half or did you submit it in its NGC 65* holder. One other thing, David what is your opinion of the cheeck on this dime getting bumped for eye appeal ?
    The President claims he didn't lie about taxes for those earning less then $250,000 a year with public mandated health insurance yet his own justice department has said they will use the right of the government to tax when the states appeals go to court.
  • Options
    Rob41281Rob41281 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Heres another shot of the obverse. The cheek really is a lot cleaner than what it appears in the 1st pic i posted. I think is more of a lighting issues thats causing it to look chattery.
    New
    image

    Original
    image
  • Options
    MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭


    Barberlover - this is the seller's images of my 1901-P Half

    imageimage

    I sent this coin into PCGS in its NGC holder - and it came back as a MS 64.

    Not satisfied with that grade, I sent the coin back in its PCGS 64 holder and
    requested a regrade and True-View imaging...and once again, the coin came back
    as a MS 64:
    image

    Still not satisfied with another 64 grade as I thought the coin was a borderline MS 65 -
    I resubmitted the coin to PCGS - Secure Plus. Now that PCGS has "split" grades
    [ in a manner of speaking...] ... the coin now resides in a PCGS 64+ holder.

    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases
  • Options
    MFHMFH Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭

    The 1892-P Dime is as I thought it should be - a MS 65.

    Aside from the eye appeal - its a 65 details.

    My 1901-P Half in a 64+ holder is as mark free - but
    two of the obverse stars are not full at the radials...
    maybe why it was kept out of a 65 holder... although
    quite a few of the Duckor Halves were not perfect
    strikes either and 99.99% of them came back as MS 66 +++

    I am not insinuating that my 1901-P Half belongs in a 66 holder;
    I was just hoping the clean mark free surfaces and the toning
    would have boosted it into an MS 65 holder.

    So be it - its still a beautiful coin. New images of this coin
    [ as well as all my other MS Halves ] will be taken by Todd Pollock
    in the near future.

    Mike Hayes
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !

    New Barber Purchases

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file