Anyone Remember a few weeks ago that 1921 Morgan a few of thought was Counterfeit?

braddick

It wasn't, nor isn't.

STONE

you have a reverse shot?

braddick

<< <i>you have a reverse shot? >>


No. But, if it helps, it looks fake too.

STONE

<< <i>

<< <i>you have a reverse shot? >>


No. But, if it helps, it looks fake too. >>


Ok, that's what I was also thinking!

roadrunner

For those of us who missed the orig thread was there a reason for slabbing a $15 Morgan that looks to be at worst counterfeit or at best a polished VF? Rare VAM? Former Proof?

roadrunner

braddick

I'm just a little foolish that way.
Seriously, I'll send in the normal stuff- coins that I'll eventually sell, but always like to toss in a couple per submission that sort of gives me then something to look forward too.

The last batch was an Ike dollar that graded out AG3.
Before that, this Morgan and a 1970-S Small date Lincoln I thought had a decent shot at getting into a regular holder albeit the color was a wild pink and lavender.

Again, it's nonsense to send some of this stuff in, but it's a cheap thrill*.





*I'm so easily amused.

BigOrange13

that coin looks really suspicious
i would have said counterfeit!

Boom

Pictures certainly can be deceiving.

That's why it's virtually impossible to even try to grade using them.