Options
A related set of ebay-isms being used more and more
wybrit
Posts: 6,953 ✭✭✭
High Grade / Good Grade
1. A coin that could be anything from G to AU.
2. A not-so subtle attempt to tell the browser "You Grade It."
Very High Grade
A coin that apparently is "better" than "high grade" or "good grade"
I don't know about you, but I find this to be an annoying development. Any other thoughts?
1. A coin that could be anything from G to AU.
2. A not-so subtle attempt to tell the browser "You Grade It."
Very High Grade
A coin that apparently is "better" than "high grade" or "good grade"
I don't know about you, but I find this to be an annoying development. Any other thoughts?
Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
0
Comments
FOR SALE Items
a seller to put a numerical grade on a coin-even if it's carefully qualified as "in our opinion" etc.
Only PCGS, NGC, ANACS and ICG coins can carry a numerical designation EXCEPT Canadian coin dealers can quote
ICCS grades.
A U.S. seller listing a non TPG coin, or even one that is graded by ICCS, has to use weasel words to indicate the
quality of the coin. I know, I've had several listings cancelled before I got the message .
Personally I use terms like "BU to choice" "Brilliant Uncirculated" or "Choice to gem" unless I know that
the coin will grade or has graded a minimum of MS or PL 65, then I use terms like "Gem" or, if it's a higher
grade, "Gem Plus".
Silly, but that's the rule......
It's just that I got my PCGS grades.
NumisTip Coin Values
and tell potential bidders that the grading is entirely up to them.
I'm careful also to meticulously itemize any flaws,edge or strike characteristics, etc.
My thinking is that it really should come down to the buyer's expertise and his/her actually
*wanting* the coin based on the visual realities presented, and not on the implied guarantee
of a particular grade. So, wouldn't you then want some indication like "high grade" in the
title for the listing? I used to use "excellent condition" a lot, or "XC."
Or sometimes I'd just say something like: "I think it's choice EF. Your mileage may vary."
Haven't sold on eBay in about 7 years, after 4-5 years of hyperactivity there.
Will be getting back to it next year, as my retirement begins to kick in.
Hope things haven't changed too much...darkside exonumists are a pretty laid-back bunch.
Best to all ~
Tom
Proud (but humbled) "You Suck" Designee, February 2010.
* The images that usually accompany auctions designated as "good grade," "high grade" or "very high grade" leave much to be desired.
* Yes, few seem to grade their coins correctly in the first place, but now we have a scale where you have even less of an idea about what is being offered.
I completely agree that it is fine to use such a designation provided the pictures are of a usable quality. I salute the lucky few who end up with MS65 coins simply called "high grade." The vast majority are apt to end up with something more like VF30 or XF40 unless the images are superb.
I recently bought the coin below (refer to my recent "newps" thread). If this had been called "high grade" I would have steered clear of it. As it was, the seller described it as UNC so I took a shot at it and was not disappointed. It is probably MS63RB.
Just to be generous I'm prepared to offer full Spink retail. I'll also arrange to pick it up the next time I'm in town.........just to save on those nasty postage fees.
....forgot to wink and grin.
<< <i>Text I completely agree that it is fine to use such a designation provided the pictures are of a usable quality. I salute the lucky few who end up with MS65 coins simple called "high grade." The vast majority are apt to end up with something more like VF30 or XF40 unless the images are superb. >>
Well I could tell from the small scan that the coin had full blazing lustre, which you almost never see on Aussie Geo V florins (except the 1931 and '36). It looked at minimum MS64.
NumisTip Coin Values