Home U.S. Coin Forum

Thanks to Mr Hall for checking out one of my coins!!See Mark Goodman's photos on Pg3&4 for your

RealoneRealone Posts: 18,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
I sent a coin to him for his review, and he returned it with a note initialled by his holiness, much appreciated on a great coin.image

Mark Goodman will be photgraphing it later this week.
BTW, It is an 1825 10c JR-5 MS64 PCGS R -5. And i wanted to know if it was accurately graded but I wanted to make sure that not only the graders reviewed but that he saw it too and to get his opinion on it, besides having the proper attribution put on the label. It is a pretty important coin in my collection and although it has a great appearance and provenance there was a spot or two that I wasn't sure about and the obv and rev were prooflike and the rev had toning on the eagle that I was unfamiliar with even though the spots have always been described in the many catgalogs that it has appeared in. The coin passed and he liked it,
so my year is made!image Another great service provided by PCGS.
«1

Comments

  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭
    image

    I bet you got all kinds of warm fuzzies inside.
  • drddmdrddm Posts: 5,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats, can't wait to see the coin!!!

    What did Hall's note say?
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    was that a free service?
    LCoopie = Les


  • << <i>was that a free service? >>



    Brown Nose Express Service™image
  • RBinTexRBinTex Posts: 4,328
    Pics? image
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin was already encapsulated as PCGS MS64. Seems to me they were reconfirming their original views on the coin.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • tahoe98tahoe98 Posts: 11,388 ✭✭✭


    image
    "government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
  • This content has been removed.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    Having an experienced numismatist review and comment positively on a coin you've spent many hours studying is fulfilling to be sure. Congrats Realone!
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • This content has been removed.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I assume that we're talking about this one ...

    1825 10c, JR.5, MS64 (PCGS) ex Heritage 4/2009:90

    I'm glad that you found someone else who likes it. >>



    Ouch! image
  • dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    imageimageimage
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • Joe, do you think it's been messed with, or what?

    What did it look like in the 1980 and 1990 auctions?
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think it's wonderful that PCGS is willing to provide this level of service. However, if I wanted an objective expert opinion on a coin, I would not go to someone who has a financial motive to bless the coin. In other words, I would not go to the party that guaranteed the grade.



    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One more thing. Based on the pictures, I believe the black spots and streaks are impurities in the planchet, and - based on the toning pattern - that the coin was dipped or cleaned long ago in an attempt to remove them. That, BTW, doesn't mean that the coin is overgraded. If the coin is otherwise nice enough, it can easily be a solid 64. But it's something that should at least be recognized before making a decision about the coin.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    if you wanted another opinion, CAC seems to be another consideration
    LCoopie = Les
  • Sunshine Rare CoinsSunshine Rare Coins Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭✭✭
    But why did it go for 9500 dollars, when a usual 64 goes for 4k or less?
  • This content has been removed.
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Realone:

    I really like the obverse of your dime, the reverse less so. But overall it is a rather pleasant looking coin but having a note from HRH and keeping it with the coin is a nice added touch. Of course, getting a sticker would be a bonus. Will it sticker? 40% chance it will sticker in my view. It probably looks MUCH better in person.

    You and I know how tough the stickering can get on these coins.

    Regardless, that is indeed a tough coin to locate and what a provenance!
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's a Strap-On version for days you don't really want to dirty your nose! imageimage

    image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Based on JO's link the coin looks a bit washed out in the centers. That along with the blue/black oxidation on the various high points of the coin concerns me more than the small alloy spots.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I assume that we're talking about this one ...

    1825 10c, JR.5, MS64 (PCGS) ex Heritage 4/2009:90

    I'm glad that you found someone else who likes it. >>



    Ouch! image >>



    Double ouch
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    That does explain things a bit. image
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That does explain things a bit. image >>



    I agree, and it is fascinating!
  • This content has been removed.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    So DH liked the coin as PQ, but JA didn't?

    The plot thickens.... image

    (Sorry, Realone, just trying to lighten the mood image Remember, your opinion is the ONLY one that matters! )
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • This content has been removed.
  • JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    100
    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very interesting story.
    I think that the price paid for this was very strong, but it is a nice coin.
    Looks to be secondary toning and the spots would concern me at that high price point.
    I too agree that an opinion from a true third party would trump an opinion from a vested party.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • This content has been removed.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I hear what you are saying Realone.
    Well said.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I didn't read Joe's comments as "CAC" vs PCGS. I read it as his opinions and, since he had knowledge of the coin, and it is not being sold (ie...no value to help/hurt), I appreciated his background info.

    As for HRH volunteering his comments....isn't that what you paid for? The review, of which he is part, that costs money? I have some coins I sent for review before as well. I didn't ask him for additional info but I did get his handwritten notes on them. That was a service that was paid for though.

    Also, sounds like you are splitting hairs on the "sending them to CAC" thing for your coins. If heritage sends them, but you are paying for it AND it is at YOUR insistence (agreement with them), then it sounds to me like you ARE sending them to CAC, just through a middleman.
    If you want CAC, then fine....just don't split hairs and hide behind "it wasn't me...it was heritage"...."but, um, well, it is my agreement with them and I pay for it".

    You like the coin. You paid for it with your money. No big deal who likes it or not. But, when you start dealing in coins that have a reputation and can be remembered (ie...people have notes and remember them), then prepare to have people comment on threads you start about such coins.

    I'm just sayin'.....

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • This content has been removed.
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the high end of numismatics
    is a dangerous place to play in
    LCoopie = Les
  • LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    It never hurts to get one or more outside opinions on any coin. The final opinion that matters is the buyers. image



    image
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>the high end of numismatics
    is a dangerous place to play in >>



    At the very least, it helps to have thick skin.
  • saintgurusaintguru Posts: 7,727 ✭✭✭
    Interesting how the most cynical remarks were made here by DEALERS (other than CCU).

    Perhaps dealers should go to the Lauraland Forum where your agenda can be bounced of each other rather than here. After all these years it has still stayed the same. image

    You have a happy collector...but you piss on him. Great business style.
    image
  • IGWTIGWT Posts: 4,975
    Al: You're collecting by die marriage, right? A collector by variety will go nuts if he obsesses over condition like a collector by type. There is greater value in Joe's observation -- "a great example of 1825 JR.5" -- than in PCGS's opinion of the grade. Variety collectors take 'em as best we can find them (even those that would be spurned by a type collector), and you happened to find a great one with wonderful provenance.
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Interesting how the most cynical remarks were made here by DEALERS (other than CCU).

    Perhaps dealers should go to the Lauraland Forum where your agenda can be bounced of each other rather than here. After all these years it has still stayed the same. image

    You have a happy collector...but you piss on him. Great business style. >>



    Couldn't have said it any better, my friend.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,477 ✭✭✭✭✭
    .... for the love of coins image
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    << the high end of numismatics
    is a dangerous place to play in >>



    At the very least, it helps to have thick skin.




    Apparently so.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Al: You're collecting by die marriage, right? A collector by variety will go nuts if he obsesses over condition like a collector by type. There is greater value in Joe's observation -- "a great example of 1825 JR.5" -- than in PCGS's opinion of the grade. Variety collectors take 'em as best we can find them (even those that would be spurned by a type collector), and you happened to find a great one with wonderful provenance. >>



    Well said.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    Posted at realone's request. He will be taking comments shortly when he gets home (on his iPhone).

    image
    image
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • al410al410 Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭
    "Interesting how the most cynical remarks were made here by DEALERS (other than CCU).

    Perhaps dealers should go to the Lauraland Forum where your agenda can be bounced of each other rather than here. After all these years it has still stayed the same.

    You have a happy collector...but you piss on him. Great business style. "


    Thanks for saying what alot of collectors on this forum feel. Not everyone is thick skinned and not everyone expects to be torn apart, actually most are feeling pretty good when they post an awesome coin like this one, only to be so picked apart as if the coin is not a great find.
    JMO
    AL
  • jhdflajhdfla Posts: 3,030 ✭✭✭
    Mark did a great job of photographing this coin. One thing I do notice is the lack of abrasions on the face and neck. Looks pretty clean to me. As far as being cleaned at one time, I'm going to guess that better than 80% of the coins of this era have been messed with in one way or another, this example doesn't look all that bad from the pics although I'm certainly no expert on bust coinage. There were 6 bidders on the coin, in a weak spring 2009 market, so there certainly was some interest in the coin, and IGWT's remark, " There is greater value in Joe's observation -- "a great example of 1825 JR.5" certainly seems to support the interest exhibited at auction for the coin. If you are happy with it, as others have said, that's all that matters... and apparently at some point in the future if you decide to put it in auction, it should do at least as well. After all, the coin is famous now and has the Realone pedigree image

    john


    I was just thinking, it is kinda funny in a sick sort of way. I collect orchids (cattleyas) and seashells (conidae), and sure the orchid folks can be a little snooty, but they don't eat their own the way some in this hobby do!
  • "...JA thought it was cleaned a long time ago and then toned over, David Hall doesn't feel that way and liked it, two diametrically opposed opinions, you side with JA but you wrote the exact opposite..."

    Hang on, am I reading this correctly? Is it correct that Joe didn't mention that the dime was cleaned in an auction catalog description he wrote a long time ago, but now he says the dime was cleaned and is toned over? If my understanding is correct, is this difference due to something that happened with the coin over the past 20 years, an honest change of opinion, auction description editing by someone else, or did Joe suspect the dime was cleaned when he wrote the catalog description, but omit mention of cleaning for some reason? The latter explanation is hard to believe, but maybe there was a good reason even if that's what happened?

    It would be interesting to see that catalog description.
  • This content has been removed.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file