Home U.S. Coin Forum

PCGS Submission results...

The two cleaned coins was slabbed coins I cracked out...The 8 TF was a pcgs holdered coin and the 1921 was a NGC holdered coin. About half this submission was raw purchases off ebay and the other half was crack outs. The raw coins graded and the slabbed coins was called cleaned...


Order #20176978 / Submission #3758346
Line # Item # Cert # PCGS No. CoinDate Denomination Variety Country Grade
1 1 12824049 7072 1878 8TF $1 US Cleaned
2 1 12824050 7154 1884-O $1 US MS63
3 1 12824051 7166 1886 $1 US MS63
4 1 12824052 7096 1880 $1 US AU55
5 1 12824053 7096 1880 $1 US AU53
6 1 12824054 7208 1891-O $1 US VF20
7 1 12824055 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US Cleaned
8 1 12824056 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US MS63

Comments

  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,960 ✭✭✭
    How did you do compared to what you were expecting?
  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The two cleaned coins was slabbed coins I cracked out...The 8 TF was a pcgs holdered coin and the 1921 was a NGC holdered coin. About half this submission was raw purchases off eaby and the other half was crack outs. The raw coins graded and the slabbed coins was called cleaned...


    Order #20176978 / Submission #3758346
    Line # Item # Cert # PCGS No. CoinDate Denomination Variety Country Grade
    1 1 12824049 7072 1878 8TF $1 US Cleaned
    2 1 12824050 7154 1884-O $1 US MS63
    3 1 12824051 7166 1886 $1 US MS63
    4 1 12824052 7096 1880 $1 US AU55
    5 1 12824053 7096 1880 $1 US AU53
    6 1 12824054 7208 1891-O $1 US VF20
    7 1 12824055 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US Cleaned
    8 1 12824056 7296 1921 $1 Morgan US MS63 >>



    Not bad results, seeing that they are at their tightest grading right now! I had an 8TF that bagged too, dont feel bad!

    image

    TC71
    image
  • 1878 8 TF was a pcgs-62 Old Green Holder that should have upgraded 63

    1884-o was a NGC-63PL I was hoping for the 63 and had my finger crossed on the PL

    1886 was a rattler pcgs-63

    1880 raw

    1880 raw

    1891-o raw

    1921 NGC-61 hoping for 62 vam-27A

    1921 NGC-64 thought this would cross easy also
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,960 ✭✭✭


    << <i>1878 8 TF was a pcgs-62 Old Green Holder that should have upgraded 63

    1884-o was a NGC-63PL I was hoping for the 63 and had my finger crossed on the PL

    1886 was a rattler pcgs-63

    1880 raw

    1880 raw

    1891-o raw

    1921 NGC-61 hoping for 62 vam-27A

    1921 NGC-64 thought this would cross easy also >>



    Wow seems like they really are tight on more than just grade but cleaning too.
  • dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    No offense, but why did you have those coins graded? Did you have 8 free submissions you needed to use or something?

    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.


  • << <i>No offense, but why did you have those coins graded? Did you have 8 free submissions you needed to use or something? >>

    was wondering the same thing.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file