I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
I'll say that it's questionable, but not flat-out AT. I've seen this type of color occure completely naturally. About 2 years ago I handled a batch of about 40 rolls of 1881-S Morgan Dollars, which had been taken straight out of the original ba and rolled up in homemade looseleaf paper rolls. All the end-roll coins had color extremely similar to this.
People have varying tastes in what they like to see on a coin's surface. If it appeals to you and you can afford whatever you'll be paying for it , buy it!
I'd say there's a 90% likelihood it's AT and 10% that it's very questionable but again, who cares what others say if you're buying it just for your own enjoyment and not expecting to eventually make a profit on it (or probably even recoup what you paid for it)?
I never thought that growing old would happen so fast. - Jim
My first tendency was AT, based on the colors on Liberty's cheek and hair. The goldish toning in the field in front of Liberty's face looks very natural though. I would find something else to buy, something where you don't have to even ask the question, if you know what I mean. Is it worth the risk, is what I'm getting at.
It does have some pull away of color at the date and stars. That is an NT clue. However the blue and purple look like they were poured on the coin so do look clearly AT. So I'm voting AT with everybody else but I wanted to post because of the pull away effect most noticeable under the 18 in the date. Does anybody have a comment on that?
Yes, most people just look at the colors and say they are too bright or 'crayon like' or whatever, and they do not look at the charcteristics of NT vs AT, such as the 'pull away effect.' I would not buy the coin just because there is some doubt in my mind about the toning, but I am not 100% that this coin is AT. That gold toning in front of Liberty's face is NT all the way. Edited to add: The annoying thing about these "AT vs NT" threads is that everyone wants to make a judgement, but nobody will back it up by saying, "The coins is AT because....." Sorry, but crayola-like, and highlighter-like are not sufficient evidence.
'Yes, most people just look at the colors and say they are too bright or 'crayon like' or whatever, and they do not look at the charcteristics of NT vs AT, such as the 'pull away effect.'
In layman's terms, would you please explain to newcomers what is meant by the 'pull away effect'? Sorry if it is self-explanatory, but I'm just not getting it.
<<In layman's terms, would you please explain to newcomers what is meant by the 'pull away effect'? Sorry if it is self-explanatory, but I'm just not getting it. >>
Under the 18 in the date and some stars you can see what looks like an untoned shadow of those devices. Right under the 18 is a tiny white area. It is as if the color was "pulled away" from the date and stars. That is an effect that is seen on some bag toned Morgan Dollars and looks natural to me.
The bright blue looks like it was liquid that was poured on the coin. Bag toned Morgans will often have colors deep in the crevices that are different from the highest parts of the devices.
This coin may have been gold toned naturally with some sky blue and purple added later by artificial means. Of course this is just guessing on my part...
Thank you for the clear explanation of the 'pull away effect'. Even I can see what you are talking about
'Bag toned Morgans will often have colors deep in the crevices that are different from the highest parts of the devices.'
Do you mean that, for example, the blue on the high points of the cotton bulbs should be a different shade than the lines within the bulbs and the 'cracks' in between the bulbs?
With respect to original toning I always ask myself the following questions:
1.) Have I seen toning similar to the pattern and color of which the coin I am interested posesses?
2.) What reasonable storage method(s) may have caused said toning (i.e., double mint set toned coins have a distinct toning "look" to them, bag toned Morgans have a distinct toning pattern/colors)
3.) Is it raw? If so, why wouldn't it be slabbed as it is so colorfully toned and sure to command a market premium?
4.) Do I know/trust seller of said coin? Does he/she have a reputation for selling NT coins?
5.) If I decide to purchase the coin and it is indeed AT, will I hate the coin forever and want to get rid of it as soon as possible.
Personally, I think that the coin has been doctored and the toning is not the result of any natural process. The colors seem too vibrant and "wet" to be of any naturally occuring toning process. I have seen Morgans toned like that but never with the irridescence shown on this one. I cannot imagine PCGS or NGC grading the coin with the above toning.
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage. ANA Member R-3147111
If you really want an authentic toned coin ...this one is currently on Ebay. Owned by one of our respected authority on toning in the PCGS boards. NGC PF65
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
–John Adams, 1826
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
<< <i>if you can't tell, you should'nt be collecting! AT >>
Thank you for your insight.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
<< <i>AT, your joking right!!! >>
Thank you for your insight.
Also looking for VF-EF Seated halves.
Sell me your old auction catalogs...
AT too!
-Paul
<< <i>It a coin I'm thinking of bidding on.
You're kidding of course?
Ray
Questions about Ikes? Go to The IKE GROUP WEB SITE
I'd say there's a 90% likelihood it's AT and 10% that it's very questionable but again, who cares what others say if you're buying it just for your own enjoyment and not expecting to eventually make a profit on it (or probably even recoup what you paid for it)?
- Jim
Ditto, ditto, ditto...
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
<< <i>
<< <i>It a coin I'm thinking of bidding on.
You're kidding of course?
Ray >>
Thank you for your insight.
in front of Liberty's face looks very natural though. I would find something else to buy, something where
you don't have to even ask the question, if you know what I mean. Is it worth the risk, is what I'm getting
at.
<< <i>Does anybody have a comment on that? >>
Yes, most people just look at the colors and say they are too bright or 'crayon like' or whatever, and they
do not look at the charcteristics of NT vs AT, such as the 'pull away effect.' I would not buy the coin just
because there is some doubt in my mind about the toning, but I am not 100% that this coin is AT. That
gold toning in front of Liberty's face is NT all the way.
Edited to add: The annoying thing about these "AT vs NT" threads is that everyone wants to make a
judgement, but nobody will back it up by saying, "The coins is AT because....." Sorry, but
crayola-like, and highlighter-like are not sufficient evidence.
do not look at the charcteristics of NT vs AT, such as the 'pull away effect.'
In layman's terms, would you please explain to newcomers what is meant by the 'pull away effect'? Sorry if it is self-explanatory, but I'm just not getting it.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>It a coin I'm thinking of bidding on.
You're kidding of course?
Ray >>
Thank you for your insight. >>
It's your money......don't ask next time.
Ray
Under the 18 in the date and some stars you can see what looks like an untoned shadow of those devices. Right under the 18 is a tiny white area. It is as if the color was "pulled away" from the date and stars. That is an effect that is seen on some bag toned Morgan Dollars and looks natural to me.
The bright blue looks like it was liquid that was poured on the coin. Bag toned Morgans will often have colors deep in the crevices that are different from the highest parts of the devices.
This coin may have been gold toned naturally with some sky blue and purple added later by artificial means. Of course this is just guessing on my part...
'Bag toned Morgans will often have colors deep in the crevices that are different from the highest parts of the devices.'
Do you mean that, for example, the blue on the high points of the cotton bulbs should be a different shade than the lines within the bulbs and the 'cracks' in between the bulbs?
The shadow effect.................I think that is what its called, see south side of stars and date.
Herb
1.) Have I seen toning similar to the pattern and color of which the coin I am interested posesses?
2.) What reasonable storage method(s) may have caused said toning (i.e., double mint set toned coins have a distinct toning "look" to them, bag toned Morgans have a distinct toning pattern/colors)
3.) Is it raw? If so, why wouldn't it be slabbed as it is so colorfully toned and sure to command a market premium?
4.) Do I know/trust seller of said coin? Does he/she have a reputation for selling NT coins?
5.) If I decide to purchase the coin and it is indeed AT, will I hate the coin forever and want to get rid of it as soon as possible.
Personally, I think that the coin has been doctored and the toning is not the result of any natural process. The colors seem too vibrant and "wet" to be of any naturally occuring toning process. I have seen Morgans toned like that but never with the irridescence shown on this one. I cannot imagine PCGS or NGC grading the coin with the above toning.
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
.....................................................
<< <i>Looks NT and AT. I think it was a natural toned coin and someone added some At to it. >>
I think this may just be the answer,
Herb
Interesting comments from everyone though and I thank each and every one of you.
Tom