Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Is this an error or unlisted

image

Just picked this up, condition is poor but the obverse is inverted... well very nearly. Freeman talks about small slipage of 10-20 degrees but considers an inversion as deliberate. Davies lists a 1943 shilling with inverted observe. What do you think or is this listed somewhere.
Gary

Comments

  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It doesn't look like a deliberate inversion- more like die rotation.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • I kind of agree although then there should be loads of examples of all the angles in between. I'm more inclined towards an error coin with possibly a smallish number with an identical rotation.
  • wybritwybrit Posts: 6,972 ✭✭✭
    Cool find nonetheless.
    Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.
  • Nice find....

    I have to check, but I think I have a 1967 rotated die ........
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,577 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OK, probably just me but I can not get too excited by 10, 20 or even 30 degrees of die axis rotation. 180 I can work with, especially with the Vicky proofs.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.


  • << <i>OK, probably just me but I can not get too excited by 10, 20 or even 30 degrees of die axis rotation. 180 I can work with, especially with the Vicky proofs. >>



    I think you are expressing a general consensus of opinion but the coin I've shown is about 160 degrees of die axis rotation, just seems too much for slipage.
Sign In or Register to comment.