<< <i>AU53 details, bodybag due to scratch running through S. >>
I'm not so sure that it is a scratch running through the mint mark. I didn't even notice it at first until jmj3esq mentioned the wicked strike through. Upon closer examination of the coin, I do believe that it is a strike-through.
Interestingly, all of the grade guesses are south of what NGC graded this coin. Maybe my picture needs work...Maybe NGC sucks....
Although, I don't think the assigned NGC grade is far from reality for this coin.
As always, appreciate the feedback!
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage. ANA Member R-3147111
AU50. Is that a strike thru or a scratch? Hard to tell from the pic.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Based on your pic, it does appear to be a strikethrough.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Technical AU-55 or 58, market graded to 62BN. >>
I think that Ziggy29 hit the nail on the head with the above statement.
I could see this coin in a AU-55 holder just as easily as a AU-58 holder. However, based upon market conditions and the scarcity of this date in higher grades, I could see this coin selling for 61 or 62 money.
Anyway, my first semi-key to the series and this coin will not be going anywhere until an upgrade is made.
Thanks to all for guessing a grade.
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage. ANA Member R-3147111
Comments
Bit of rub around ear? Not me expertise
so, may be a bit off...but still NICE!
bob
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
<< <i>AU53 details, bodybag due to scratch running through S. >>
Looks like that mark might be raised. Rather than a scratch, it might be a die crack, meaning no bodybag. But it's hard to see 3D with a 2D picture.
<< <i>AU53 details, bodybag due to scratch running through S. >>
I'm not so sure that it is a scratch running through the mint mark. I didn't even notice it at first until jmj3esq mentioned the wicked strike through. Upon closer examination of the coin, I do believe that it is a strike-through.
Interestingly, all of the grade guesses are south of what NGC graded this coin. Maybe my picture needs work...Maybe NGC sucks....
Although, I don't think the assigned NGC grade is far from reality for this coin.
As always, appreciate the feedback!
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Any opinions?
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
<< <i>Technical AU-55 or 58, market graded to 62BN. >>
I think that Ziggy29 hit the nail on the head with the above statement.
I could see this coin in a AU-55 holder just as easily as a AU-58 holder. However, based upon market conditions and the scarcity of this date in higher grades, I could see this coin selling for 61 or 62 money.
Anyway, my first semi-key to the series and this coin will not be going anywhere until an upgrade is made.
Thanks to all for guessing a grade.
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111