Home U.S. Coin Forum

What would be a good label instead of "First Strike"......................

BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
........should TPG's choose to continue the program under a different name?

Choice Strike?
I'm glad I am a Tree

Comments

  • ICG seems to be flying under the radar with their "First Day of Issue" labeling. Caught the two idiots on HSN last night hawking them to the moon. Also keeps ICG out of the line of fire on the "1st Strike" issue because they are not making that claim.
    Rufus T. Firefly: How would you like a job in the mint?

    Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?



    image
  • How about "Big Mistake", or "How greedy are we, anyway?".

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • Early Grade
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    How about "US Mint Early Release". Nah, that would never work. You can't call them what they really are. Never mind.image


  • << <i>How about "Big Mistake", or "How greedy are we, anyway?". >>



    "FIR$T $TRIKE" image
    GO AHEAD! I DOUBLE-DOG DARE YOU TO RATE ME A 1!
  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,148 ✭✭✭✭
    No I think First Released or something inline with that is what it should be.....

    In my opinion the entire First Strike thing is a waste of time and money.....

    No difference to me.....
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • garsmithgarsmith Posts: 5,894 ✭✭
    If you use PCGS's submiting standard established with the 20th anniversary sets the proper labling would be:

    "First blindly submitted" or "Submitted sight unseen"


  • << <i>How about "US Mint Early Release". Nah, that would never work. You can't call them what they really are. Never mind.image >>



    I agree--maybe "First thirty days"--but then again any designation is actually meaningless from a numismatic point of view--but wait, I forgot we are talking about bullion. But it really doesn't affect me as I don't buy them or sell them--just hope they don't start this with proof sets and Commemorative Dollars.
    Curmudgeon in waiting!
  • How about..........
    "I was dumb enough to pay $10 for this little flag!" label??
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,186 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>How about..........
    "I was dumb enough to pay $10 for this little flag!" label?? >>

    image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    << How about..........
    "I was dumb enough to pay $10 for this little flag!" label?? >>
    image Cheers, RickO
  • IGWTIGWT Posts: 4,975
    The labels could be used to provide the notice that is required for class action lawsuits.
  • AuldFartteAuldFartte Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭✭
    How about "Another Marketing Gimmick" image
    image

    My OmniCoin Collection
    My BankNoteBank Collection
    Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.
  • Hmmm...

    "First Hyped"
    "You'll Believe Anything"
    "Sat in a warehouse and happened to be shipped within the first thirty days" (need small font for that)

    Anyone can make a difference, but most people probably shouldn't. -- Marge Simpson
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    ***poof***
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • Why bother...Just grade the damn thing...............image
    ......Larry........image
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,219 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Expensive Label™
  • How about an arrow pointing to owner with a label that says....
    "I'm with dummy"??
  • WoodenJeffersonWoodenJefferson Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭✭
    ***poof***
    Chat Board Lingo

    "Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    "Barnum was right"
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How about: "THIS IS AN I.Q. TEST". image

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • flaminioflaminio Posts: 5,664 ✭✭✭
    " "
  • 53BKid53BKid Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭
    How about just 'PCGS DCAM-70' or 'NGC MS-69'?

    I personally think that's enough.
    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
  • Cash Cow
  • bumanchubumanchu Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭


    How about "Coin Grading Company Casino-Style Coin Roulette?"
    And I ain't lying this time.
  • First Rook™
  • LokiLoki Posts: 897 ✭✭
    PR71, PR71DCAM, MS70 (because they will never grade an MS higher) image
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    First Hump!!
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,703 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The term "First Strike" has muddied up the understanding for many newbies. It will be
    overcome as they learn more about coins but they'll have to unlearn this first.

    The TPG's could just start selecting early die state coins from whenever they are struck
    or shipped and labeling these "First Strikes". It would be less confusing and no one would
    likely have a problem with them giving their professional opinion on the die state of any
    coin. It would certainly be a huge plus for education and might be rewarding for collectors
    who have been seeking early die state coins. EDS would be the ideal terminology (Early
    Die State) so "First Strike" can be reserved for very early die state.
    Tempus fugit.


  • << <i>The term "First Strike" has muddied up the understanding for many newbies. It will be
    overcome as they learn more about coins but they'll have to unlearn this first.

    The TPG's could just start selecting early die state coins from whenever they are struck
    or shipped and labeling these "First Strikes". It would be less confusing and no one would
    likely have a problem with them giving their professional opinion on the die state of any
    coin. It would certainly be a huge plus for education and might be rewarding for collectors
    who have been seeking early die state coins. EDS would be the ideal terminology (Early
    Die State) so "First Strike" can be reserved for very early die state. >>

    How will any TPG know which coins these are if dies are changed often as the mint claims?
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977


    << <i>First Hump!! >>

    Hey Stman, you're infringing on my trademarked Double Hump™imageimage
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,703 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i> How will any TPG know which coins these are if dies are changed often as the mint claims? >>




    I haven't looked at a lot of the eagles but die wear can be seen pretty early even on silver coins.
    Tempus fugit.
  • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
    First Shaft!
    It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

  • Foul Ball?
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will say it one more time... unless the USMint selects & certifies coins culled from the process, to specific criteria, there is NO WAY any TPG will determine early die state or any other 'stipulated' value enhancing condition. There are many contributing factors, (all of which, they endeavor to control during the process), die, pressure, planchet - all contribute to the 'apparent' condition of the resulting product. As in any process, there are operational variances, as anyone who understands manufacturing and statistical process control can tell you... as I am trying to tell you. Once it leaves the process, no one - and I mean NO ONE - can authoritatively state the coin was a first or early strike. Cheers, RickO
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,703 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I will say it one more time... unless the USMint selects & certifies coins culled from the process, to specific criteria, there is NO WAY any TPG will determine early die state or any other 'stipulated' value enhancing condition. There are many contributing factors, (all of which, they endeavor to control during the process), die, pressure, planchet - all contribute to the 'apparent' condition of the resulting product. As in any process, there are operational variances, as anyone who understands manufacturing and statistical process control can tell you... as I am trying to tell you. Once it leaves the process, no one - and I mean NO ONE - can authoritatively state the coin was a first or early strike. Cheers, RickO >>



    It depends on the dies.

    There is a roughness to many of them that is quickly worn off. Those exhibiting this roughness would necessarily be early strikes.

    There is also the simple fact that the mint would never change out a die that shows no die wear so those showing such wear are necessarily later strikes.

    Tempus fugit.
  • First Issues

    It fits on several levels. It says that they are early coins but doesn't really say exactly when. It fits with the first thirty days idea. And can be confused with First Issued which would mean almost the same as a true first strike, but it doesn't actually say that.
  • secondrepublicsecondrepublic Posts: 2,619 ✭✭✭
    Fwha ha ha ha ha
    "Men who had never shown any ability to make or increase fortunes for themselves abounded in brilliant plans for creating and increasing wealth for the country at large." Fiat Money Inflation in France, Andrew Dickson White (1912)
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    "It depends on the dies.

    There is a roughness to many of them that is quickly worn off. Those exhibiting this roughness would necessarily be early strikes.

    There is also the simple fact that the mint would never change out a die that shows no die wear so those showing such wear are necessarily later strikes. "

    Again, this depends on a non-factual and uncertifiable 'opinion'. Unless it is done at striking, it is not 'certified'. Cheers, RickO
  • DieClashDieClash Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Why bother...Just grade the damn thing...............image >>



    image If its MS70 it doesn't matter whether it's First Strike or not. You can't improve on perfection. "Buy the coin, not the 'plastic'" image

    Face it, if the label requires one to send the "unopened" U.S. Mint package containing the so called First Strike coins, then it is obvious that the grading "professionals" can not discern a First Strike from a later strike (But they allegedly can grade an MS69 from an MS70) image. This whole marketing gimmick is nothing more than 'first packaged' and/or 'first shipped' coins masquerading as "First Strike" to make a buck. Now that Coin Universe has been sued too, I wonder how long it will be before the "First Strike" label joins the garbage heap of history as a bad-idea-without-legs that has run its course into oblivion?

    If TPGs want to regain some credibility in the face of this debacle, I think Conder101 had a great suggestion: Market the coins as "First Issue". It resolves the obvious image problem associated with 'First Strike' when considering that the only way to be considered such is to be 'first packaged' and 'first shipped' by the Mint. And "First Issue" has enough market appeal and ambiguity so as to be truly misleading to the collecting public, yet be potentially very successful for the beleaguered TPGs at the same time! image Conder displays true Marketing genius! image If you worked for Coin Universe you may have saved them from some serious embarassment. ...Now where's that eBay link, I've got me some "First Strikes" to sell...

    "Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ball One ? Batter Up ?
    Omega Plastics, Inc. ?
    Alpha Coin Grading image (ACG image )

    PCGS just needs to put additional numbers on coins, like 0000001, 0000002, 00000003, etc... then there'll be no more fussing. You might have the first grade or the last grade, but you will have a grade .
  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    Just using a (nice) gold label rather than blue, or maybe a silver label, if the coin is submitted within, say, the same guidelines as first strike, would actually not be so bad. No designation, but a premium label. I would really like to see PCGS consider using something similar to the type of labels that BGS uses for 9 or higher graded sportscards, I think those labels look really sharp.
  • mrearlygoldmrearlygold Posts: 17,858 ✭✭✭
    In memory of chuck lipcon
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    first pig

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file