<< <i>What if instead of saying who NOT to do business with, just give them a grade.....kinda like Consumer Reports does?
Example:
Anaconda.........A+ dmplrainbow..........d-
This is done everywhere by consumers... >>
That's a good idea. Then the list will have both who to do business with and who not to do business with listed on it and I don't think there would be any legal problems.
Comments
<< <i>Great idea but I'm sure people are concerned about the possible litigation that could come from their statements. Sad but true.
Especially if you add a certain third-world slabber from Florida...
A list called "I prefer not to do business with on eBay" and list all the facts why.
Example:
Anaconda.........A+
dmplrainbow..........d-
This is done everywhere by consumers...
<< <i>What if instead of saying who NOT to do business with, just give them a grade.....kinda like Consumer Reports does?
Example:
Anaconda.........A+
dmplrainbow..........d-
This is done everywhere by consumers... >>
That's a good idea. Then the list will have both who to do business with and who not to do business with listed on it and I don't think there would be any legal problems.
I was thinking dmplrainbow would be more like f-
<< <i>What if instead of saying who NOT to do business with, just give them a grade.....kinda like Consumer Reports does?
Example:
Anaconda.........A+
dmplrainbow..........d-
This is done everywhere by consumers... >>
...True...but Consumer Reports has a staff of lawyers working to mitigate exposure to law suits.
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.