VAM results in from ANACS, mixed bag of attributions

I sent in a dozen coins to ANACS recently, got them back Monday. I was not happy with the grades (see earlier post) but the VAMs are good. I thought folks might want to see what came out. One cleaned, the others graded AU 53-MS 63. The coins have been sent back to ANACS for review of the grades.

Proud recipient of YOU SUCK more than once and less than 100 times.
0
Comments
Free Trial
1878 VAM 17 is cleaned
1878 VAM 14.2 is AU 55
1884 O/S VAM 3 is MS 60
1884 O/S VAM 5 is AU 58
1896 VAM 4 is MS 63
1878 8 TF VAM 14 is AU 53
1884 S VAM 5 is AU 53
1878 7/8 TF VAM 38 is Cleaned/Scratched
1878 7 TF VAM 45 are MS 61 and MS 62
1878 7 TF VAM 170 is AU 53
1878 7/8 TF VAM 42 is MS 60.
The AU coins are all MS in my opinion with the exception of the 84 S. The strikes on those coins are weak, but luster remains. We will see what Wes Jacobs at ANACS has to say. The 1896 is minimally 64, with gorgeous tone. VAM 45 are 64 and 65. I grade according to a reference set of ANACS MS 60-65 and PCGS 60-65.
It took me 7-8 submissions to ANACS to figure out what they look for. Luster, luster, luster. If it's not there, forget it. They really won't
go above MS63 unless the coin has full original mint luster.
Edited to add: I've had them re-grade coins too. I wish you luck, although I've managed to get a vam or two adjusted they will not
change grades.
Free Trial
test it. For example my label looks like:
Coin #7 of 21
1878-S Morgan
VAM-6, Hot 50
DMPL
I do it with PCGS too. It seems to give better results!
I've also written "weak strike", etc....anything to prod them.
Free Trial