NEED INFO: 1943-S WALKER-BREEN #5200, "NO MONOGRAM"
TWODOGS
Posts: 1,419
I came across a 1943-S with no AAW on the reverse. (Very weak strike, but Unc.) Breen lists it as #5200. In Breen's book it is listed as "Presently rare. Only 6 known." My first question is...Is this something that has become a fairly common find, or is it still considered rare? My second question...Is this just a case of an overpolished die?
J.C.
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
0
Comments
We ARE watching you.
ANSWER MY QUESTIONS!!!
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
And I have no answer.
But I have a question.
Where did you get it?
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
Except for maybe Puff.
We ARE watching you.
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
About the 1943-S Walker with the variety 106 "no" AW (Adolf Weinman) monogram missing is that it is not all that rare..... There are at least 15 other varieties attributed to the 1943-S Walker and none of them that I am aware of are major rarities.
*******************************************************************************
See ya on the other side, Dudes.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Thanks Puff. >>
You are entirely welcome TD.
<< <i>In Breen's book it is listed as "Presently rare. Only 6 known." >>
That was possibly true in the 1950's when much of the book was compiled. And yes it is the result of an over polished die.