Someone's getting screwed for Christmas!!!

Ken BINed this today...
I bought this yesterday!
I wrote the seller and asked if that was the set I was getting and they E-Mailed back it was!!! Hmmmmmm....
I bought this yesterday!
I wrote the seller and asked if that was the set I was getting and they E-Mailed back it was!!! Hmmmmmm....
It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!
0
Comments
Shopping at Victoria's Secret again Marty?
We ARE watching you.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Looking at the pics, I went back and forth....same pic for the set so I think seller #2 ripped the pic. Maybe they have a set to sell, no pic, look at other auctions and ripped it to use. a lot of people rip pics from the USMint for SAEs, mint sets, etc (but, for an older set, it is nice to see what you will be getting).
The pic is really the same as you can tell by the penny, the half dollar, and the warp on the lower right of the set.
So, Marty/Ken, what is it about the set that you see that you liked so much? The half has what kind of look for you?
(I'm trying to learn)
Ron
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Cameron Kiefer
Cameron Kiefer
These sets are common, and aside from those that have been abused, they are pretty much the same unless you are buying D-Cams or exceptionally high grade pieces.
Still it's a darn shame that Ebay sellers insist that they use the same photos for different lots. Ebay does not charge them any more for new pictures. All they have to do is take a new photo, but I guess that's too much trouble.
So far as the Proof-like claim, that was auctioneer's hype. By definition, these SMS were proof-likes, especially the 1966 and '67 versions of them!
Russ, NCNE
Non-melted, of course.