Uniformity?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43d51/43d510a2ba8ac9a1f59ea5c585409b2fe2a88c2d" alt="morganbarber"
1907Quarter has a current post about having finished a Liberty Nickel set. I want to congratulate him. However, he says that they are all in G-VG condition. While I like uniformity, I tend to collect higher grade common dates and lower grade keys and semi-keys. Do you think that uniformity should trump higher quality? I have very limited funding. In my Morgans, for instance, I have some common and better date pieces in MS 62-64, however, most of my better date and semi-key coins are closer to VG-F. I would love a '93 O in MS65, but could never afford one. I wouldn't really mind a 1985 O in VF, but can aford one in MS64. The question, once again, is: Do you seek uniformity or best affordable pieces? I am very interested in your responces.
I collect circulated U.S. silver
0
Comments
I have a VF walker set that is almost complete that I take pride in, was looking for uniformity in that set, and was fairly cheap.
3 "DAMMIT BOYS"
4 "YOU SUCKS"
Numerous POTD (But NONE officially recognized)
Seated Halves are my specialty !
Seated Half set by date/mm COMPLETE !
Seated Half set by WB# - 289 down / 31 to go !!!!!
(1) "Smoebody smack him" from CornCobWipe !
IN MEMORY OF THE CUOF
You have 96 Morgs in a set and a $1,000 will get you a VG 93-S, a 89CC in XF or a 81-S in MS67 or 10 common dates in ms64. a slightly different story.
My Morgan set looks like hell because I bought whatever I liked at the time so I have PCGS in 8 different kinds & colors of holders, monster toners in ACG PhotoSlabs, NGC Sample Slabs, ANACS etc and all the rest along with raw & DMPL, regular MS etc. That wouldn't work if I were making a Registry Set.