This is the kind of creamy luster I die for. Guess the grade??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1aae/f1aae3253f72e414193755c3a716971d68582c5c" alt="oreville"
This is the creamy (frosty) luster on the Washington quarters that I absolutely adore.
These are the pics. I just bought this coin. In a PCGS slab. Guess the grade???
1936-S Quarter obverse
1936-S quarter reverse
These are the pics. I just bought this coin. In a PCGS slab. Guess the grade???
1936-S Quarter obverse
1936-S quarter reverse
A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
0
Comments
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Nice coin
Byron
My first YOU SUCK on May 6 2005
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
By the way Happy 271st birthday George!!!!!!!!!!
Russ, NCNE
This is a special coin indeed.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Rusty
dipping in the wrong solutions. To me it looks like it has never been messed with.
Well done, beautiful quarter.
Camelot
Andy
First POTD 9/19/05!!
Another obverse picture - non supersized
Another reverse picture - non supersized
PCGS MS-65. In the green insert slab of the mid 1990's.
PCGS MS-65
Personally, I love this coin but admit I have not yet viewed it in person. I believe it to be a very strong MS-65 but not quite a MS-66.
Why?
#1 The reverse is weakly struck except in the very center as the tips of the wings practically disappear into the fields.
#2 There is a luster braise/scrape on the eagle's leg which limits the grade. It is much more apparent and stands out primarily because the coin has such a thick and frosty "skin."
#3 The obverse has some blemishes, indeed.
#4 The die crack is a neutral factor in my view.
Not withstanding all of the above, and regardless of whether this coin is a technical 64 or 65 it is a monster in my view for the original skin it does possess. This is my kind of quarter.
I had to fend off some very spirited bidding for this quarter and had to pay top dollar for this quarter. I paid $395. I would pay that sum of money again in a heartbeat!
But this coin stays right where it is as it would be criminal to see this coin overmaxed out in a 66 holder.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
By the way, some of our fellow posters probably have no idea how lucky we are to have MrEureka as a fellow poster. He is an esteemed numismatist in my book and knows patterns better than anyone else I know in the country !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Welcome MrEureka! Boy you ARE tough on those quarters.
I hope I am not embarrassing you.
<< <i>I will also state that today, all grading services except PCGS would probably slab this coin a 66 >>
Well, I don't believe that to be true for the past two years. I have seen an awful lot of PCGS (as well as NGC and all the others) 66 and even 67 graded early washie quarters that look a lot worse than your coin. That is a coin I would have bid on had I known about it. It is simply gorgeous. Sell it to me!!!
That's a nice quarter and would get a * over at NGC
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6