Your thoughts on this NGC statehood quarter with a PL designation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d15/f5d151ed580488263ecc2b161eaabf5c40061af8" alt="wingedliberty"
I just did a BIN on this. This is the first time I have seen a PL designation on a statehood quarter.
I will be interesting to see how it looks when I get it. I though the price was great. Any thoughts?
I wonder how the pops will look down the road in PL?
Mississippi 25C NGC-MS66PL
Brian.
I will be interesting to see how it looks when I get it. I though the price was great. Any thoughts?
I wonder how the pops will look down the road in PL?
Mississippi 25C NGC-MS66PL
Brian.
0
Comments
peacockcoins
Brian.
as well.
Brian.
Actually, I still believe the PL designation is appropriate on any coin and should not be limited to just a few, like Morgan Dollars for example.
I applaud NGC for acknowledging the PL designation on state quarters and it really shows the "pro collector" stance NGC has been employing for many years over there
Do any of you Modern collectors ever see this PL designation used on, say, Ike dollars? Alan Hagar (all ACG non-sense aside) wrote the Ike book and stated there are very few PL Ikes. I have seen Ikes (designated by ACG obviously) years ago and they did look very much PL. I haven't seen one for years however....was I just imagining things or do these exsist?
jom
This is only a guess.
Any thoughts?
Brian.
IMHO, there is absolutely no reason to limit the PL designation to Morgan dollars, besides sheer laziness. These are GREAT collector coins and deserve recognition. I have personally not pushed the issue, because, quite frankly, if they started recognizing them, the temptation to slab them would be great and I enjoy my raw coins just as they are.
jom
Brian.
tend to be marked up a little more than other coins of the same date.
The '76 type 1 is one of the easier ones but accounts for less than 1%
of mint set coins.