FBL question.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebc26/ebc268d560098dbced03da784b46b7ca5e619c48" alt="jesbroken"
This coin is too scratched to grade, but would it have qualified for FBL? Just curious.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
1
Comments
FBL on Franklins and FH on SLQs are likely the two designations that I find least consistent within the TPG grading spheres. I think the coin would go FBL even with the tiny nicks along the lines, but the definitions used by the TPGs might not specify it as such.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
What @TomB said but I would add FS on Jefferson Nickels.
It's possible. A hair weak at very center, but could still pass.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Yes, it is a weakly struck 48. I wondered whether the weakness would prevent the FBL being designated even with complete lines. Not my series, but curious nonetheless. Thank you.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
It looks to me like it would get the FBL designation. Some minor nicks, but would hardly be noticeable without the magnification. Cheers, RickO
It would FBL at PCGS which only grades the lower lines. It PROBABLY would grade FBL at NGC which grades both sets of lines.
The dings across the lower set of lines are reasonably small so they generally would not cause a problem. Part of the issue with dings and weak areas is dependent upon the date/mm being graded. 1948's are common coins with FBL, so both TPG's tend to give the benefit of the doubt to a small problem. Coins that are tougher to get with FBL, the 1953-S being the most notorious, will NOT get the benefit of the doubt.
U.S. Type Set
I think so.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
PCGS yes, NGC no. NGC considers both sets of lines in its designation and I think the top row is very weak in the center.