Home› U.S. Coin Forum

It should've CAM'd

SilverEagle1974SilverEagle1974 Posts: 139 ✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Can you post a coin, which you think should have received a CAM designation, but did NOT ?
I'm NOT trying to cause controversy, but want to see those coins.

Thanks,

Chris

Comments

  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭✭✭

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These half dollars were graded this year and last year. They did not receive a Cameo designation.

    I think they all should have been given a Cameo designation.

    Some of the 1959, 1961, 1953 and 1950 Cameo Proof Franklin half dollars displayed on Coinfacts have lower quality fields and/or devices than the coins shown above.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This one looks distinctly CAM to me:

    Coin Photographer.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...