Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Collecting Dahlonega Varieties - 1840-D Small D Half Eagle

Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭
edited October 31, 2020 11:30AM in U.S. Coin Forum

The Dahlonega Half Eagle series contains several dates that have a variety of die combinations resulting in different mint mark sizes and placement. I collect all of the Dahlonega denominations and try to include the recognized die varieties. Some of the varieties are acknowledged by the third party grading companies, some are yet to be officially recognized. One of the more interesting dates is the 1860-D $5.

In 1860, 14,635 half eagles were produced in Dahlonega. From that year, there are three die varieties. The following are the coins I’ve included in my own collection:

1860-D$5 Medium D (Winter 46-GG)

(Photo from Winter, Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861, 3d ed.)



(Photo of 1860-D $5 Medium D PCGS AU58 (CAC) purchased from Doug Winter.)
According to Doug Winter, this is the most common variety for the date.

1860-D $5 Large D (Winter 46-FF)

(Photo from Winter)


(1860-D $5 Large D AU58)
According to Winter, this is a rare variety and distinguished by its taller, proportionally more narrow mint mark that is closer to the branch stem and arrow feather tip.

1860-D $5 Large D (Winter 46-EE)

(Photo from Winter)


(1860-D $5 Large D AU55+)
According to Winter, this particular variety is the rarest of the three. It is distinguished from Variety 46-FF by the more distant placement of the D from the branch and feather tip. The mint mark also appears to tilt slightly down toward the right.

Adding the varieties aspect to my Dahlonega collection has certainly increased the challenge and expense to my search for nice coins. Some of these varieties are very rare and come at a premium above the more common issues. I hope to discuss more of the varieties added to my collection in this thread in the future.

Comments

  • Options
    NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,989 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good luck with your quest. Nice coins!

  • Options
    ilmcoinsilmcoins Posts: 525 ✭✭✭✭

    That is a great challenge!

  • Options
    calgolddivercalgolddiver Posts: 1,402 ✭✭✭✭✭

    thanks for sharing. Great information. Good luck with your quest !!

    Top 25 Type Set 1792 to present

    Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set

    successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 27,502 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 12, 2020 9:29AM

    that's gonna be a nice set all the way around id be proud of that as well

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 12, 2020 2:00PM

    Winchester, do you have a full list of the recognized / unrecognized? How many?

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 12, 2020 3:24PM

    @ms70 said:
    Winchester, do you have a full list of the recognized / unrecognized? How many?

    Check out Doug Winters book. CoinFacts notes then in the text.

    Without checking, about 38-61 so 23 years on minting and 2-4 die varieties per year. Approx guess 65 varieties.

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,812 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sound challenging. Good luck.

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    @ms70 said:
    Winchester, do you have a full list of the recognized / unrecognized? How many?

    The PCGS Registry Set, Dahlonega Complete Set with Major Varieties lists a total of 70, https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/branch-mint-gold/dahlonega-gold-set-major-varieties-circulation-strikes-1838-1861/601.

    But, you can go crazy with minor varieties like the 1839-D $5 ‘D Over 3’, 1839-D $2.50 ‘Complete Branch’, 1841-D $2.50 ‘Fraction Bar Bisecting D’, 1855-D $1 ‘Full Date’ (which may not be a true ‘variety’, rather a strike quality), etc, etc ...

    @Boosibri is correct that Doug Winter’s book is the most complete authority on the subject.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    stevebensteveben Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Winchester1873 wow...that large D! amazing appeal!

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fantastic coin. Looks very nice

  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 1, 2020 5:26PM

    That's a gorgeous piece.

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Will you include the weak D coins on the 50 and 51 HE’s as they are considered not as desirable to many? Your collecting goals are lofty indeed.

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    Will you include the weak D coins on the 50 and 51 HE’s as they are considered not as desirable to many? Your collecting goals are lofty indeed.

    I did include an NGC 1851-D (Weak D) $5 in my collection. I posted a photo in an older discussion on the topic, https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1017132/weak-mint-marks-low-value-issues-or-desirable-variety#latest.
    I know I am in the minority for seeing the desirability and value in the ‘weak’ D varieties. I believe they are necessary if completeness is the goal.

  • Options
    Wahoo554Wahoo554 Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Do you have all the varieties for the 1850-D? Would love to see them if so.

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    @Wahoo554 said:
    Do you have all the varieties for the 1850-D? Would love to see them if so.

    I have just one of the three varieties, the 28-U.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Your challenge will be the 48-D/D. I have seen three in 15 years.

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    @Boosibri said:
    Your challenge will be the 48-D/D. I have seen three in 15 years.

    Would you be interested to know if there is another Dahlonega issue with a re-punched or over-struck mintmark in addition to the 1846-D/D $2.50, 1846-D/D $5, and 1848-D/D $5, which is not currently listed in the PCGS varieties?

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Winchester1873 said:

    @Boosibri said:
    Your challenge will be the 48-D/D. I have seen three in 15 years.

    Would you be interested to know if there is another Dahlonega issue with a re-punched or over-struck mintmark in addition to the 1846-D/D $2.50, 1846-D/D $5, and 1848-D/D $5, which is not currently listed in the PCGS varieties?

    Yes very interested! It must not be reported in DW's book.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So is this a 4-H? Only a 12

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge , that appears to be a 4-F due the placement of the 3 in the date and location of the mint mark relative to the top of the 1 (above and farther to right.)
    Steve

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Winchester1873 said:
    @Smudge , that appears to be a 4-F due the placement of the 3 in the date and location of the mint mark relative to the top of the 1 (above and farther to right.)
    Steve

    Ok, I thought it was that if not 4-H.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Quite a set you are building there

  • Options
    jonrunsjonruns Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congratulations on your successful sale!!!

  • Options
    Winchester1873Winchester1873 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭

    Another ‘naked eye’ Dahlonega Half Eagle variety is the 1840-D $5 Small D. The variety is distinguished by a smaller mint mark, obviously, but also by a die crack on the reverse that appears to bisect the mint mark. This variety is distinguished from the ‘Tall D’ variety of the same year. The Small D variety is considered rare by Doug Winter.

    The photo below is a 1840-D Small D $5, PCGS AU53 CAC, from my now-retired Indian Rocks Beach Collection.


    Example of the 1840-D Tall D $5

    1840-D Tall D $5 PCGS AU55 CAC also from my collection.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very tough variety. I cherry picked one several years ago

  • Options
    ScarsdaleCoinScarsdaleCoin Posts: 5,187 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Curious folks thoughts on the “9”
    Of this coin


    Jon Lerner - Scarsdale Coin - www.CoinHelp.com
  • Options
    jonrunsjonruns Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 7, 2020 6:35PM

    Looks to me like an 1839-D $2.50:

    "The obverse has the mintmark located below the bust and over the 3 in the date. The 3 is doubled inside the upper loop while the 9 touches the curl and is far from the denticles. The digit was improperly cut and it looks as if the date were 1839/8. This is incorrect and this has been improperly labeled as an “1839/8” overdate for many years."

  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 22,685 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great thread!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file