CoinKat, What are your reasons to say it might have been dipped. Usually one can see it when coin in hand. But on a picture? Have tried to think around that way, but can not say one way or another.
The unnatural brightness combined with the whiteness of a coin that saw circulation. Had the coin not been dipped the pattern of wear on the coin, especially the high points, would show a variation in color from wear.
It is still a market acceptable coin- and a reasonable circulated example that does not appear to be obvious hairlining or anything that suggests it was cleaned.
The bigger issue with George V quarters is understanding and appreciating the strike of the portrait. There is a difference between wear and the typical strike which is often not overly compelling.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Comments
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
eBay Store
DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
<< <i>25 cents >>
Yeah, Canadian....23 cents US.
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
Trends prices in problem-free condition are $15 for VF-20 and $40 in EF-40.
<< <i>1918 is a common date isn't it? >>
It is a common date, but the condition is slightly better than average circulated condition for this issue.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
looks better than what is usually seen. Had it not been enhanced with a dip, $25-30.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
What are your reasons to say it might have been dipped.
Usually one can see it when coin in hand. But on a picture?
Have tried to think around that way, but can not say one way or another.
The unnatural brightness combined with the whiteness of a coin that saw circulation. Had the coin not been dipped the pattern of wear on the coin, especially the high points, would show a variation in color from wear.
It is still a market acceptable coin- and a reasonable circulated example that does not appear to be obvious hairlining or anything that suggests it was cleaned.
The bigger issue with George V quarters is understanding and appreciating the strike of the portrait. There is a difference between wear and the typical strike which is often not overly compelling.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.