PCGS Questionable Authenticity Questions
Reveries
Posts: 94
I purchased two very nice 1849 Great Britain Godless Florins on EBAY and submitted them to PCGS for grading.
Both were returned and body-bagged as Questionable Authenticity? I am sure that this issue has come up before
with some of you? The sellers will take back the coins - thats not the problem. What do i do next?
No other comments were provided by PCGS. Do they know what they are talking about - should i send them to NGC?
It is odd that two different Florins purchased from separate sellers were both returned?
Need help on this and what information is available on counterfeit Florins.
molto thanks
Robert
Both were returned and body-bagged as Questionable Authenticity? I am sure that this issue has come up before
with some of you? The sellers will take back the coins - thats not the problem. What do i do next?
No other comments were provided by PCGS. Do they know what they are talking about - should i send them to NGC?
It is odd that two different Florins purchased from separate sellers were both returned?
Need help on this and what information is available on counterfeit Florins.
molto thanks
Robert
0
Comments
If you're really curious, and don't mind spending a few bucks to have someone else look at them, send them to Robert Matthews. He has forgotten more about counterfeit British coins, then PCGS or NGC has ever known.
click here
The 1849 "Godless" seems an odd one to fake when just about every Gothic Florin in the subsequent series is worth more. I would agree with the advice above - get a second opinion. Our own MacCrimmon has handled a few of these and might be of help as well.
Do you have any pictures of these pieces?
https://www.civitasgalleries.com
New coins listed monthly!
Josh Moran
CIVITAS Galleries, Ltd.
Well, just Love coins, period.
PCGS has certified a bunch of these pieces, that can't be the reason IMO.
The problem that i have is that it would be highly unlikely (odds) to have both coins graded as questionable?
One Florin came from the US and the other Great Britain. I have pictures but have had trouble posting them
on this site due to the complexity required to link the images to this site! I know i am a MAC guy but this is
just a very poor interface for posting images.
The feedback has been great and very useful.
I have finally figured it out. Here is the obverse of one of the 1849 Florins that was returned from PCGS.
They really need to provided a detailed explanation as to why this coin is a forgery!
Here is the reverse. Many thanks for all of your feedback!
"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5
"For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
<< <i>But I'd suggest you send it in to NGC and/or ANACS. If it gets slabbed at one of these services, you might try sending it back to PCGS in the slab for them to cross over. Good luck.
>>
So, pay once to have it bodybagged, then pay again to try NGC or ANACS, then pay PCGS again to have it cross (maybe).
Sounds time-consuming and expensive.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media" - William Colby, former CIA director
* Most of the pieces I saw had well formed peripheral beads all the way around the coin. They were round and uniformly sized. Your piece has some beads looking more like teeth, particularly between 6 o'clock and 9 o'clock. The beads also look somewhat nonuniform. That said, a couple of the listings I saw had some similar bead anomalies as well.
* It may be just the fuzziness of the picture, but the obverse lettering on your coin looks a bit weak. Most of the examples I saw had very sharp lettering all the way around.
Otherwise, I don't see any real alarm bells. I'd have to see the coin in hand to go any further. There is speculation that this particular date was minted in 1849, 1850 and maybe even 1851, so variations in quality are likely to be plentiful.
What I would do:
* Post a picture of the other example.
* Test the coins for a silver "ring." A silver coin should have a long a pleasant ringing sound when gently struck while in the air.
* Don't bother sending it to another TPG or resubmitting. You're just throwing away good money. This coin does not appear to be mint state. If you slab an 1849 florin that is short of MS, you'll find it to be a losing proposition some day when it's time to sell. Keep in mind that there are a lot of 1849 florins out there, small mintage be hanged.
* Since the seller is allowing you a return, I wouldn't hesitate to return the coin pictured.
* Furthermore, I'd hold out for a certified UNC example or a raw UNC from a highly reputable dealer. Northeast has a nice PCGS MS64 one for sale right now, for example (and they are accepting offers for it).
* If you have your heart set on keeping one of these, send them to an expert for examination. There are many people here I would trust with such a request and have had good experiences with in past dealings.
For comparison's sake, below are obverse shots of my two examples and a resized (and sharpened) picture of your piece.
At first I thought the beading appearance was an optical illusion with the coin being slightly angled for the photographs but clearly this is not the case, so these weaknesses are real. I am inclined to thing the piece shown to be authentic but can not say I have complete confidence in that, and beg off by stating that it would best be seen in hand. If not to wiped out by the day I will have a closer look at my own & I have two examples but mine both have the sharp beading, and no doubling or mushiness.
I must confess to not liking this date as well as the dates from the 1850s and 1860s, and do prefer the Roman numeral dating. I guess keeping these is somewhat price-dependent, although you are now out the additional grading fees. Sorry about that. I just left mine in 2x2s as the coin is not so valuable in a relative sense.
Well, just Love coins, period.
<< <i>
<< <i>But I'd suggest you send it in to NGC and/or ANACS. If it gets slabbed at one of these services, you might try sending it back to PCGS in the slab for them to cross over. Good luck.
>>
So, pay once to have it bodybagged, then pay again to try NGC or ANACS, then pay PCGS again to have it cross (maybe).
Sounds time-consuming and expensive. >>
Of course you're right, and I should have qualified my statement (though I thought it was understood) that if the OP wishes to have it slabbed, then that's one way to play the slab game.
"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5
"For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
This is 64 also and exhibits sharp lettering, the beads on the reverse however are not as well formed as Wybrits examples.
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
PCGS may have decided to err on the side of caution. If it is a fake, it's frighteningly good. However, I'd be curious to get NGC's opinion on the piece, as they do far more Darkside material than PCGS. One data point doth not conclusive make.
Regardless, I think PCGS owes the submitter more information than just "we don't think it's authentic."
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
Also, the "wear" or strike on the rev. crowns of your example looks to be somewhat indistinct. This could just be wear or maybe it is this way from being a cast piece. Definitely 'ring' the piece as Wybrit suggested.
I'm not sure what that means. Just an observation.
Collecting:
Conder tokens
19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm